Back to the Future: Eternal Recurrence and the Death of Socrates

Abstract One sense in which Thus Spoke Zarathustra might indeed be a book "for none" is that none of us can agree what it says. But in the last few decades it seems that certain questions have achieved some recognition as questions that the Zarathustra commentator might want to answer. These questions look something like this: Is it really Nietzsche's most philosophically significant book (as he sometimes claims)? How does it fit together with his other books? Is part IV an embarrassing addition or a central and indispensable conclusion to the book? Is there a coherent conception of the Übermensch ? Does Nietzsche consider the latter desirable or even possible? Does Zarathustra? What is the Eternal Recurrence—a ..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,679
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Jonathan R. Cohen (1996). Born to Affirm the Eternal Recurrence. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 3 (3):1-11.
    Maryanne J. Bertram (1988). No Fool Like an Old Fool. Philosophy Research Archives 14:333-342.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-05-18

    Total downloads

    35 ( #34,138 of 549,087 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    4 ( #19,228 of 549,087 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums