"Considerandum Est Quid Sit Beatitudo": Aquinas on What Happiness Really Is

Res Philosophica 93 (1):161-184 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aquinas may seem profligate in defining ‘happiness’ (beatitudo). He says, “by the name ‘happiness’ is understood the ultimate perfection of a rational or of an intellectual nature” (ST Ia q.62 a.1 co.). He also says, “‘happiness’ names the attainment of the ultimate end” (ST IaIIae q.2 pro.). He further says the following “definition of happiness” is “good and adequate”: “Happy is the one who has all that he desires” (ST IaIIae q.5 a.8 ad 3). So which expresses what happiness really is? Which gives us the quid est of happiness? In this essay, I argue that his quid est definition of happiness is put in terms of “the attainment of the ultimate end.” I further argue that, once that definition is properly understood, it becomes clear that Aquinas thinks happiness just is intimately knowing and enjoying God. I close by focusing on one downstream interpretive effect that this interpretation could plausibly have; it may influence our understanding of the relationship between virtue and happiness in Aquinas.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is this thing called happiness?Fred Feldman - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Happiness and Transcendent Happiness.Stephen Theron - 1985 - Religious Studies 21 (3):349 - 367.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
58 (#248,189)

6 months
7 (#176,166)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joseph Stenberg
San Jose State University

Citations of this work

Thomas Aquinas.Ralph McInerny & John O'Callaghan - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations