Consequences of Rejecting Constructivism: “Hold Tight and Pedal Fast”. Commentary on Slezak's “Radical Constructivism: Epistemology, Education and Dynamite”
Graduate studies at Western
Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):112-119 (2010)
|Abstract||Purpose: One of my goals in the paper is to investigate why realists reject radical constructivism (RC) as well as social constructivism (SC) out of hand. I shall do this by means of commenting on Peter Slezak’s critical paper, Radical Constructivism: Epistemology, Education and Dynamite. My other goal is to explore why realists condemn the use of RC and SC in science and mathematics education for no stated reason, again by means of commenting on Slezak’s paper. Method: I restrict my comments to Slezak’s paper and leave it to the reader to judge which, if any, of the reasons that I advance for these two states of affairs are not specific to Slezak’s paper. Other readers might not agree with my interpretations of Slezak’s paper, including Slezak himself, but I offer them after having worked with von Glasersfeld in interdisciplinary research in mathematics education for over 25 years. Findings: My findings are that Slezak: (1) rejects RC and SC on the basis of unjustified criticisms, (2) does not explore basic tenets of RC nor of SC beyond the unjustified criticisms, (3) rejects how SC and RC have been used in science and mathematics education, based at least in part on the unjustified criticisms, (3) dislikes how SC has been used in science and mathematics education, a dislike that fuels his rejection of any constructivism, and (4) doesn’t explore how RC has been used in scientific investigations in mathematics education. On the basis of these findings, I conclude that how epistemological models of knowing might be used in science or mathematics education would be better left to the educators who use them in interdisciplinary work|
|Keywords||idealism experiential reality constraints interaction adaptation first-order models second-order models scheme self-reflexivity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
P. Slezak (2010). Radical Constructivism: Epistemology, Education and Dynamite. Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):102-111.
D. I. Dykstra (2010). What Can We Learn From the Misunderstandings of Radical Constructivism? Commentary on Slezak's “Radical Constructivism: Epistemology, Education and Dynamite”. Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):120-126.
J. Confrey (2011). The Transformational Epistemology of Radical Constructivism: A Tribute to Ernst von Glasersfeld. Constructivist Foundations 6 (2):177-182.
P. Cobb (2011). Implications of Ernst von Glasersfeld's Constructivism for Supporting the Improvement of Teaching on a Large Scale. Constructivist Foundations 6 (2):157-161.
Ernst von Glasersfeld (2010). Why People Dislike Radical Constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):19-21.
A. Scholl (2012). Between Realism and Constructivism? Luhmann's Ambivalent Epistemological Standpoint. Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):5-12.
Mark Olssen (1996). Radical Constructivism and Its Failings: Anti-Realism and Individualism. British Journal of Educational Studies 44 (3):275 - 295.
S. J. Kemp (2012). Constructivist Criteria for Organising and Designing Educational Research: How Might an Educational Research Inquiry Be Judged From a Constructivist Perspective? Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):118-125.
Kevin C. de Berg (2006). The Status of Constructivism in Chemical Education Research and its Relationship to the Teaching and Learning of the Concept of Idealization in Chemistry. Foundations of Chemistry 8 (2):153-176.
N. Bednarz & J. Proulx (2011). Ernst von Glasersfeld's Contribution and Legacy to a Didactique des Mathématiques Research Community. Constructivist Foundations 6 (2):239-247.
M. Larochelle & J. Désautels (2011). The Science Wars Go Local: The Reception of Radical Constructivism in Quebec. Constructivist Foundations 6 (2):248-253.
P. Cariani (2010). Onwards and Upwards, Radical Constructivism. A Guest Commentary. Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):127-132.
D. I. Dykstra (2010). Radical Constructivism Has an Answer – But This Answer Is Not an Easy One. Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):22-30.
K. H. Müller (2010). The Radical Constructivist Movement and Its Network Formations. Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):31-39.
Added to index2010-11-20
Total downloads10 ( #114,517 of 739,472 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,472 )
How can I increase my downloads?