Dispositions and subjunctives

Philosophical Studies 148 (3):323 - 341 (2010)
It is generally agreed that dispositions cannot be analyzed in terms of simple subjunctive conditionals (because of what are called “masked dispositions” and “finkish dispositions”). I here defend a qualified subjunctive account of dispositions according to which an object is disposed to Φ when conditions C obtain if and only if, if conditions C were to obtain, then the object would Φ ceteris paribus . I argue that this account does not fall prey to the objections that have been raised in the literature.
Keywords Disposition  Mask  Fink  Subjunctive  Counterfactual   Ceteris paribus
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 19,700
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Stephen Mumford (1998). Dispositions. Oxford University Press.
David Lewis (1997). Finkish Dispositions. Philosophical Quarterly 47 (187):143-158.

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Gabriele Contessa (2013). Dispositions and Interferences. Philosophical Studies 165 (2):401-419.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

2,919 ( #45 of 1,790,290 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1,270 ( #37 of 1,790,290 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.