Does doxastic transparency support evidentialism?
Dialectica 62 (4):541-547 (2008)
| Abstract | Nishi Shah has recently argued that transparency in doxastic deliberation supports a strict version of evidentialism about epistemic reasons. I argue that Shah's argument relies on a principle that is incompatible with the strict version of evidentialism Shah wishes to advocate. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesTodd Long (2012). Mentalist Evidentialism Vindicated (and a Super-Blooper Epistemic Design Problem for Proper Function Justification). Philosophical Studies 157 (2):251-266.
Andrew Reisner (forthcoming). Leaps of Knowledge. In Timothy Chan (ed.), The Aim of Belief. OUP.
Nathan Segars (2006). The Will and Evidence Toward Belief: A Critical Essay on Jonathan E. Adler's Belief's Own Ethics. Social Epistemology 20 (1):79 – 91.
Andrew Reisner (2007). Evidentialism and the Numbers Game. Theoria 73 (4):304-316.
Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (2006). No Norm Needed: On the Aim of Belief. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):499–516.
Anthony Robert Booth (2008). A New Argument for Pragmatism? Philosophia 36 (2):227-231.
Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (2006). Voluntarism and Transparent Deliberation. South African Journal of Philosophy 25:171-176.
Nishi Shah (2006). A New Argument for Evidentialism. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):481–498.
Andrei Buleandra (2009). Doxastic Transparency and Prescriptivity. Dialectica 63 (3):325-332.
Masahiro Yamada (2010). A New Argument for Evidentialism? Philosophia 38 (2):399-404.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads63 ( #14,717 of 549,125 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,740 of 549,125 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
