David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (2):331-345 (2009)
Plotinus’s theory of dual selfhood has ethical norms built into it, all of which derive from the ontological superiority of the higher (or undescended) soul in us overthe body-soul compound. The moral life, as it is presented in the Enneads, is a life of self-perfection, devoted to the care of the higher self. Such a conception of morality is prone to strike modern readers as either ‘egoistic’ or unduly austere. If there is no doubt that Plotinus’s ethics is exceptionally austere, it will be argued below that it is not ‘egoistic.’ To that effect, the following questions will be addressed: Are the virtues, civic as well as purificatory, mere means to Plotinus’s metaphysically conceived ethical goal? To what extent must the lower self abnegate itself so as to enable the higher self to ascend to Intellect and beyond? And if self-perfection lies at the centre of the Plotinian moral life, is there any conceptual room left in it for other-regarding norms of conduct? A close reading of selected passages from Plotinus’s tractate I.2 On Virtues and tractate VI.8 On Free Will and the Will of the One will, it is claimed, bring elements of answer to these questions
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Giannis Stamatellos (2011). Virtue, Privacy and Self-Determination. International Journal of Cyber Ethics in Education 1 (4):35-41.
Similar books and articles
Plotinus (1991/1983). The Enneads. Penguin UK.
Dominic J. O'Meara (1993). Plotinus: An Introduction to the Enneads. Oxford University Press.
Plotinus (1949). [Enneads]. Boston, C. T. Branford Co..
J. Noel Hubler (2008). Locating the Cosmos in the Divine and the Body in the Soul. International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (3):321-335.
Suzanne Stern-Gillet (2000). Le Principe Du Beau Chez Plotin: Réflexions sur "Enneas" VI.7.32 et 33. Phronesis 45 (1):38 - 63.
Suzanne Stern-Gillet (2000). Le Principe Du Beau Chez Plotin: Réflexions sur Enneas VI.7.32 et 33. Phronesis 45 (1):38-63.
Riccardo Chiaradonna (2012). Plotinus' Account of the Cognitive Powers of the Soul: Sense Perception and Discursive Thought. [REVIEW] Topoi 31 (2):191-207.
Cinzia Arruzza (2011). Passive Potentiality in the Physical Realm: Plotinus' Critique of Aristotle in Enneads II 5 . Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (1):24-57.
Wendy Elgersma Helleman (2011). Plotinus and Magic. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 4 (2):114-146.
Svetla Slaveva-Griffin (2009). Plotinus on Number. Oxford University Press.
Kieran McGroarty (2006). Plotinus on Eudaimonia: A Commentary on Ennead I. Oxford University Press.
Plotinus (1964). The Essential Plotinus: Representative Treatises From the Enneads. Hackett Publishing Company Incorporated.
Michael A. Slote (2011). The Impossibility of Perfection: Aristotle, Feminism, and the Complexities of Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Marilena Vlad (2007). De l'unité de l'intellect à l'un absolu. Chôra 5:121-139.
Lara Denis (1999). Kant on the Perfection of Others. Southern Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):25-41.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads4 ( #258,815 of 1,102,884 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #297,281 of 1,102,884 )
How can I increase my downloads?