Ethics of open access to biomedical research: Just a special case of ethics of open access to research
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 2 (1):31 (2007)
The ethical case for Open Access (OA) (free online access) to research findings is especially salient when it is public health that is being compromised by needless access restrictions. But the ethical imperative for OA is far more general: It applies to all scientific and scholarly research findings published in peer-reviewed journals. And peer-to-peer access is far more important than direct public access. Most research is funded so as to be conducted and published, by researchers, in order to be taken up, used, and built upon in further research and applications, again by researchers (pure and applied, including practitioners), for the benefit of the public that funded it – not in order to generate revenue for the peer-reviewed journal publishing industry (nor even because there is a burning public desire to read much of it). Hence OA needs to be mandated, by researchers' institutions and funders, for all research
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael Parker (2013). The Ethics of Open Access Publishing. BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):16.
Peter Suber, Unbinding Knowledge: A Proposal for Providing Open Access to Past Research Articles, Starting with the Most Important.
John Willinsky & Juan Pablo Alperin (2011). The Academic Ethics of Open Access to Research and Scholarship. Ethics and Education 6 (3):217 - 223.
Richard Wellen (2004). Taking on Commercial Scholarly Journals: Reflections on the 'Open Access' Movement. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 2 (1):101-118.
Stevan Harnad, Fast-Forward on the Green Road to Open Access: The Case Against Mixing Up Green and Gold.
Katja Mruck & Günter Mey (2008). Using the Internet for Scientific Publishing: FQS as an Example. Poiesis and Praxis 5 (2):113-123.
Ulrich Herb, Open Access - a Panacea? Science, Society, Democracy, Digital Divide (Open Access - Ein Wundermittel? Wissenschaft, Gesellschaft, Demokratie, Digital Divide).
Christian Byk (2002). Conflicts of Interests and Access to Information Resulting From Biomedical Research: An International Legal Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):287-290.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads1 ( #301,885 of 1,013,737 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?