David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 7 (6):405 - 411 (1988)
Considerable controversy was stirred by the contrast between the specific approaches to public policy contained in the first draft of the Catholic bishops' letter on the U.S. economy and the policies favored by the Reagan administration. However, a much more basic contrast actually existed between the bishops' underlying vision of economic life and contemporary capitalism. The pastoral challenges a separation between moral criteria and economic activity that is deeply embedded in modernity itself. Indeed, the splitting off of economic life from its moral-religious matrix is seen by the bishops' critics as a positive, defining feature of democratic capitalism. The critics see the separate economic and moral-religious spheres related by due balance; the bishops, while acknowledging an autonomy to economic life, emphasize that its fundamental choices remain moral. The bishops (and, for different reasons, their critics) have preferred to minimize the contrast between the letter's vision and the contemporary economy. They avoid any clearcut judgment on the economic system by stressing pragmatism and reforms; but implicitly they are granting a strictly conditioned acceptance of reformist capitalism, the condition being the system's openness to questioning and change.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael A. Simons, Catholic Teaching, Catholic Values, and Catholic Voters: Reflections on Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship.
James W. Boettcher (2003). “Political, Not Metaphysical”. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:205-219.
William E. Murnion (1989). The Ideology of Social Justice in Economic Justice for All. Journal of Business Ethics 8 (11):847 - 854.
H. M. Burdenski & D. H. Dunson (1999). Acquiring Economic Justice for All: An Ongoing Struggle. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 20 (2):93 - 99.
James P. Egan (1988). Sin and the Economic Analysis of the Pastoral: A Class Act? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 7 (6):425 - 431.
Daniel J. Koys (1988). Values Underlying Personnel/Human Resource Management: Implications of the Bishops' Economic Pastoral Letter. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 7 (6):459 - 466.
Robert L. Armacost (1988). Productivity and the Economic Pastoral: Implications for Growth. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 7 (6):467 - 473.
Stephen Bickham (1988). The Bishops' Pastoral: A New Theory of Justice. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 7 (6):437 - 443.
William S. Reece (1989). Why is the Bishops' Letter on the U.S. Economy so Unconvincing? Journal of Business Ethics 8 (7):553 - 560.
Christopher L. Pines (1988). The Bishops' Dilemma with Capitalism: A Critical Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 7 (6):445 - 452.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #147,888 of 1,018,316 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?