Global justice for humans or for all living beings and what difference it makes

Journal of Ethics 9 (1-2):283 - 300 (2005)
I begin with an account of what is deserved in human ethics, an ethics that assumes without argument that only humans, or rational agents, count morally. I then take up the question of whether nonhuman living beings are also deserving and answer it in the affirmative. Having established that all individual living beings, as well as ecosystems, are deserving, I go on to establish what it is that they deserve and then compare the requirements of global justice when only humans are taken into account with the requirements of global justice when all living beings are taken into account.
Keywords anthropocentric  distant peoples  future generations  liberty  libertarianism  nonanthropocentric  population policy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/25115825
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,974
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
James P. Sterba (2005). How to Achieve Global Justice. Journal of Global Ethics 1 (1):53 – 68.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

33 ( #96,685 of 1,725,822 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #166,958 of 1,725,822 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.