David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (1):115 – 153 (2007)
[INTRODUCTION] Like the terms 'dialectic', 'Aufhebung' (or 'sublation'), and 'Geist', the term 'concrete universal' has a distinctively Hegelian ring to it. But unlike these others, it is particularly associated with the British strand in Hegel's reception history, as having been brought to prominence by some of the central British Idealists. It is therefore perhaps inevitable that, as their star has waned, so too has any use of the term, while an appreciation of the problematic that lay behind it has seemingly vanished: if the British Idealists get any sort of mention in a contemporary metaphysics book (which is rarely), it will be Bradley's view of relations or truth that is discussed, not their theory of universals, so that the term has a rather antique air, buried in the dusty volumes of Mind from the turn of the nineteenth century. This is not surprising: the episode known as British Idealism can appear to be a period that is lost to us, in its language, points of historical reference (Lotze, Sigwart, Jevons), and central preoccupations (the Absolute). Even while interest in Hegel continues to grow, interest in his Logic has grown more slowly than in the rest of his work, with Book III of the Logic remaining as the daunting peak of that challenging text - while it is here that the British Idealists focussed their attention and claimed to have uncovered that 'exotic' but 'vanished specimen', the concrete universal. Finally, as the trend of reading Hegel pushes ever further in a non-metaphysical direction, it might be thought that the future of the concrete universal is hardly likely to be brighter than its recent past - for it may seem hard to imagine how a conception championed by the British Idealists, who were apparently shameless in their metaphysical commitments, can find favour in these more austere and responsible times. In this paper, however, I want to make a case for holding that there is something enlightening to be found in how some of the British Idealists approached the 'concrete universal', both interpretatively and philosophically. At the interpretative level, I will argue that while not everything these Idealists are taken to mean by the term is properly to be found in Hegel, their work nonetheless relates to a crucial and genuine strand in Hegel's position, so that their discussion of this issue is an important moment in the reception history of his thought. At a philosophical level, I think that the question that concerned Hegel and these British Idealists retains much of its interest, as does their shared approach to it: namely, how far does our thought involve a mere abstraction from reality, and what are the metaphysical and epistemological implications if it turns out it does not? As such, I will suggest, taking seriously what these British Idealists have to say about the concrete universal can help us both in our understanding of Hegel, and in our appreciation of the contribution Hegel's position can make to our thinking on the issues that surround this topic
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Paweł Rojek (2008). Three Trope Theories. Axiomathes 18 (3):359-377.
James Gordon Finlayson (2015). Hegel, Adorno and the Origins of Immanent Criticism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (6):1142-1166.
Paul Giladi (2014). Ostrich Nominalism and Peacock Realism: A Hegelian Critique of Quine. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 22 (5):734-751.
Robert Stern (2012). Is Hegel's Master–Slave Dialectic a Refutation of Solipsism? British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2):333-361.
Richard Shillcock (2014). The Concrete Universal and Cognitive Science. Axiomathes 24 (1):63-80.
Similar books and articles
Alasdair C. MacIntyre (1972). Hegel. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
C. Baumann (2011). Adorno, Hegel and the Concrete Universal. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (1):73-94.
Andrew Fiala (2004). Linguistic Nationalism and Linguistic Diversity in German Idealism. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (1):159-183.
Peter P. Nicholson (1990). The Political Philosophy of the British Idealists: Selected Studies. Cambridge University Press.
Tom Rockmore (2004). Hegel, Idealism, and Analytic Philosophy. Yale University Press.
Paul Redding (2011). The Metaphysical and Theological Commitments of Idealism: Kant, Hegel, Hegelianism. In Douglas Moggach (ed.), Politics, Religion, and Art: Hegelian Debates. Northwestern University Press
Alfredo Ferrarin (2001). Hegel and Aristotle. Cambridge University Press.
Alejandro A. Vallega (2008). Unbounded Histories: Hegel, Fanon, and Gabriel García Marquez. Idealistic Studies 38 (1/2):41-54.
F. Beiser (2003). Hegel and Naturphilosophie. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):135-147.
Alasdair C. MacIntyre (1976). Hegel: A Collection of Critical Essays. University of Notre Dame Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads62 ( #55,010 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #147,216 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?