Graduate studies at Western
Inquiry 27 (1-4):137-142 (1984)
|Abstract||This note criticizes the political consequences Feyerabend draws from his ?epistemological anarchism?. Democratic relativism holds that since no traditions are ?true?, all must be given equal status in a free society. A basic protective structure is required, though, to keep the various institutions from overwhelming one another. I argue that Feyerabend provides no assurance that the protective structure would not be taken over by particular institutions; parallel problems exist for education. Hence Feyerabend's proposal is unworkable in principle. Furthermore it is undesirable since members of traditions would not wish to have their beliefs regarded as ?one set among many?. The pluralism Feyerabend wants already exists naturally in nontotalitarian societies; hence the institutionalization of pluralism is unnecessary and would do more harm than good|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Evan M. Selinger (2003). Feyerabend's Democratic Critique of Expertise. Critical Review 15 (3-4):359-373.
Steven Yates (1985). II. More on Democratic Relativism: A Response to Alford. Inquiry 28 (1-4):450-453.
Harvey Siegel (1989). Farewell to Feyerabend. Inquiry 32 (3):343 – 369.
Jonathan Y. Tsou (2003). Reconsidering Feyerabend's 'Anarchism'. Perspectives on Science 11 (2):208-235.
Robert P. Farrell (2000). Will the Popperian Feyerabend Please Step Forward: Pluralistic, Popperian Themes in the Philosophy of Paul Feyerabend. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (3):257 – 266.
Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2002). Paul Feyerabend Und Thomas Kuhn. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 33 (1):61-83.
Paul Feyerabend (1980). Democracy, Elitism, and Scientific Method. Inquiry 23 (1):3 – 18.
Ian James Kidd (2012). Feyerabend, Pseudo-Dionysius, and the Ineffability of Reality. Philosophia 40 (2):365-377.
Robert P. Farell (2001). Feyerabend's Metaphysics: Process-Realism, or Voluntarist-Idealism? [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science 32 (2):351-369.
C. Fred Alford (1985). III. Yates on Feyerabend's Democratic Relativism. Inquiry 28 (1-4):113 – 118.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads7 ( #142,372 of 739,304 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,304 )
How can I increase my downloads?