David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (5):258-262 (2012)
The requirements of the UK Equality Act 2010 and some high profile criticism for using a potentially ageist methodology have prompted the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) to assess the processes and methodology it uses to make appraisal decisions. This paper argues that NICE has established rigorous systems to protect against ageist decisions, has no track record of ageism and is well placed to meet the requirements of new UK equality legislation
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
M. Schlander (2008). The Use of Cost-Effectiveness by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE): No(T yet an) Exemplar of a Deliberative Process. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (7):534-539.
M. Quigley (2007). A NICE Fallacy. Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (8):465-466.
A. Pearce (2012). Women Requesting Caesareans: Ethical Implications in Light of the New National Institute for Clinical Excellence Guidelines. Clinical Ethics 7 (4):161-165.
Patrick Brown & Michael Calnan (2013). NICE Technology Appraisals: Working with Multiple Levels of Uncertainty and the Potential for Bias. [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (2):281-293.
Debra A. DeBruin, Joan Liaschenko & Anastasia Fisher (2011). How Clinical Trials Really Work Rethinking Research Ethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 21 (2):121-139.
L. B. Mccullough (2011). Arboriculture in Clinical Ethics: Using Philosophical Critical Appraisal to Clear Away Underbrush in Ethical Analysis and Argument. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (1):1-5.
Alex Rajczi (2007). A Critique of the Innovation Argument Against a National Health Program. Bioethics 21 (6):316–323.
L. B. McCullough (2013). Critical Appraisal of Clinical Judgment: An Essential Dimension of Clinical Ethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (1):1-5.
Margaret B. Liu (2010). A Clinical Trials Manual From the Duke Clinical Research Institute: Lessons From a Horse Named Jim. Wiley-Blackwell.
Micahel F. Green, Stimulating the Development of Drug Treatments to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia.
R. John Bench (1989). Health Science, Natural Science, and Clinical Knowledge. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (2):147-164.
Bridget Pratt & Bebe Loff (2013). A Framework to Link International Clinical Research to the Promotion of Justice in Global Health. Bioethics 27 (3):387-396.
Johannes J. F. Schroots (2003). Ageism in Science: Fair-Play Between Generations. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4):445-451.
Dan Corbett (2004). Excellence in Canada: Healthy Organizations – Achieve Results by Acting Responsibly. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 55 (2):125 - 133.
Robert Crozier & James Wulach (1982). Book Review: Prison Life and Predicting Violence. [REVIEW] Criminal Justice Ethics 1 (1):53-56.
Added to index2012-01-03
Total downloads57 ( #77,199 of 1,911,506 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,144 of 1,911,506 )
How can I increase my downloads?