Religion and Bioethics: Can We Talk? [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (4):339-350 (2011)
Religious voices were important in the early days of the contemporary field of bioethics but have now become decidedly less prominent. This is unfortunate because religious elements are essential parts of the most foundational aspects of bioethics. The problem is that there is an incommensurability between religious language and languages of public discourse such as the “public reason” of John Rawls. To eliminate what is unique in religious language is to lose something essential. This paper examines the reasons for the marginalization of religion in bioethics, shows the limitations of Rawls’s notion of public reason, and argues for a more robust role for theology in articulating a new language for public discourse in bioethics
|Keywords||Politics Public discourse Rawls Bioethics Religion Bioethics: Medical ethics Philosophy: Analytic philosophy Health policy Professionalism The professions and inter-professionalism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Lisa Sowle Cahill (1990). Can Theology Have a Role in “Public” Bioethical Discourse? Hastings Center Report 20 (4):10-14.
Daniel Callahan (1990). Religion and the Secularization of Bioethics. Hastings Center Report 20 (4):2-4.
Daniel Callahan (1999). The Hastings Center and the Early Years of Bioethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (1):53-71.
Courtney S. Campbell (1990). Religion and Moral Meaning in Bioethics. Hastings Center Report 20 (4):4-10.
Elliot N. Dorff & Louis E. Newman (eds.) (1995). Contemporary Jewish Ethics and Morality: A Reader. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Iain Brassington (2013). What's the Point of Philosophical Bioethics? Health Care Analysis 21 (1):20-30.
William E. Stempsey (2012). Bioethics Needs Religion. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (12):17-18.
Similar books and articles
Howard Brody & Arlene Macdonald (2013). Religion and Bioethics: Toward an Expanded Understanding. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (2):133-145.
David E. Guinn (ed.) (2006). Handbook of Bioethics and Religion. Oxford University Press.
David Hollenbach (1994). Public Reason/Private Religion? A Response to Paul J. Weithman. Journal of Religious Ethics 22 (1):39 - 46.
James P. Sterba (1999). Reconciling Public Reason and Religious Values. Social Theory and Practice 25 (1):1-28.
Timothy F. Murphy (2012). In Defense of Irreligious Bioethics. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (12):3-10.
Lisa Sowle Cahill (2006). Theology's Role in Public Bioethics. In David E. Guinn (ed.), Handbook of Bioethics and Religion. Oxford University Press.
John H. Evans (2006). Who Legitimately Speaks for Religion in Public Bioethics? In David E. Guinn (ed.), Handbook of Bioethics and Religion. Oxford University Press.
Martin E. Marty (1992). Religion, Theology, Church, and Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (3):273-289.
Leigh Turner (2003). Bioethics and Religions: Religious Traditions and Understandings of Morality, Health, and Illness. Health Care Analysis 11 (3):181-197.
M. Cathleen Kaveny (2006). The Nbac Report on Cloning : A Case Study in Religion, Public Policy and Bioethics. In David E. Guinn (ed.), Handbook of Bioethics and Religion. Oxford University Press.
Summer Johnson (2006). Multiple Roles and Successes in Public Bioethics: A Response to the Public Forum Critique of Bioethics Commissions. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (2):173-188.
Michael Scott (2010). Religious Language. Philosophy Compass 5 (6):505-515.
Kevin Vallier (2011). Against Public Reason Liberalism's Accessibility Requirement. Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (3):366-389.
John H. Evans (2006). Between Technocracy and Democratic Legitimation: A Proposed Compromise Position for Common Morality Public Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (3):213 – 234.
Added to index2011-09-12
Total downloads14 ( #113,646 of 1,100,829 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #80,800 of 1,100,829 )
How can I increase my downloads?