Religion and Bioethics: Can We Talk? [Book Review]

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (4):339-350 (2011)
Abstract
Religious voices were important in the early days of the contemporary field of bioethics but have now become decidedly less prominent. This is unfortunate because religious elements are essential parts of the most foundational aspects of bioethics. The problem is that there is an incommensurability between religious language and languages of public discourse such as the “public reason” of John Rawls. To eliminate what is unique in religious language is to lose something essential. This paper examines the reasons for the marginalization of religion in bioethics, shows the limitations of Rawls’s notion of public reason, and argues for a more robust role for theology in articulating a new language for public discourse in bioethics
Keywords Politics  Public discourse  Rawls  Bioethics  Religion  Bioethics: Medical ethics  Philosophy: Analytic philosophy  Health policy  Professionalism  The professions and inter-professionalism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,365
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 17 references

Citations of this work BETA
William E. Stempsey (2012). Bioethics Needs Religion. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (12):17-18.
Similar books and articles
Timothy F. Murphy (2012). In Defense of Irreligious Bioethics. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (12):3-10.
Martin E. Marty (1992). Religion, Theology, Church, and Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (3):273-289.
Michael Scott (2010). Religious Language. Philosophy Compass 5 (6):505-515.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-09-12

Total downloads

14 ( #115,725 of 1,102,738 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #84,424 of 1,102,738 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.