Religiously binding the imperial self : classical pragmatism's call and liberation philosophy's response
In Gregory Fernando Pappas (ed.), Pragmatism in the Americas. Fordham University Press (2011)
|Abstract||My essay begins by providing a broad vision of how William James’s psychology and philosophy were a two-pronged attempt to revive the self whose foundations had collapsed after the Civil War. Next, I explain how this revival was all too successful insofar as James inadvertently resurrected the imperial self, so that he was forced to adjust and develop his philosophy of religion in keeping with his anti-imperialism. James’s mature philosophy of religion therefore articulates a vision of the radically ethical saint religiously bound to a decidedly pluralistic universe. I evaluate James’s philosophy of religion by comparing it to Enrique Dussel’s psychological portrait of the imperialist ego, Dussel’s attempt to religiously bind this ego, and the more radical philosophy that results. I suggest that Dussel’s philosophy of liberation: 1) better theorizes the religious contraction of the self as a necessary part of ethical and political life and 2) offers a more concrete and radically democratic philosophy. My overarching aim is to show how Dussel’s liberation philosophy can help critically develop James’s pragmatist claim that religion might provide a force for widely and positively transforming our ethical and political lives.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alexander V. Stehn (Dec 2011). Toward an Inter-American Philosophy: Pragmatism and the Philosophy of Liberation. Inter-American Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):14-36.
Michael D. Barber (1998). Ethical Hermeneutics: Rationality in Enrique Dussel's Philosophy of Liberation. Fordham University Press.
Nelson Maldonado Torres (2008). Against War: Views From the Underside of Modernity. Duke University Press.
William James (2011). Essential William James. Prometheus Books.
Manuel Vargas (2005). Eurocentrism and the Philosophy of Liberation. APA Newsletter on Hispanic/Latino Issues 4 (2):8-17.
Enrique Dussel (2003). The Concept of Fetishism in Marx's Thought (Elements for a General Marxist Theory of Religion). Radical Philosophy Review 6 (1):1-28.
Enrique Dussel (2003). The Concept of Fetishism in Marx's Thought (Elements for a General Marxist Theory of Religion), Part II of II. Radical Philosophy Review 6 (2):93-129.
Enrique D. Dussel (2012). Ethics of Liberation in the Age of Globalization and Exclusion. Duke University Press.
Michael R. Slater (2009). William James on Ethics and Faith. Cambridge University Press.
Michael R. Slater (2008). Pragmatism, Realism, and Religion. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):653-681.
Robert J. Roth (1998). Radical Pragmatism: An Alternative. Fordham University Press.
David C. Lamberth (1999). William James and the Metaphysics of Experience. Cambridge University Press.
Enrique Dussel (2007). From Fraternity to Solidarity: Toward a Politics of Liberation. Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (1):73-92.
Enrique Dussel (1999). Six Theses Toward a Critique of Political Reason: The Citizen as Political Agent. Radical Philosophy Review 2 (2):79-95.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-03-21
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?