David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The naturalism versus interpretivism debate in social science is traditionally framed as the question of whether social science should attempt to emulate the methods of natural science. I argue that this manner of formulating the issue is problematic insofar as it presupposes an implausibly strong unity of method among the natural sciences. I propose instead that the core question of the debate is the extent to which reliable causal inference is possible in social science, a question that cannot be answered by comparisons between social and natural science. I explore how some common arguments on both sides of the issue should be reexamined if the naturalism versus interpretivism debate is understood as I propose.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nancy C. M. Hartsock (1980). Social Life and Social Science: The Significance of the Naturalist/Intentionalist Dispute. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:325 - 345.
Huw Price (2004). Naturalism Without Representationalism. In Mario De Caro & David Macarthur (eds.), Naturalism in Question. Harvard University Press. 71--88.
Brian Fay (2006). For Science in the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (2):227-240.
Roy Bhaskar (1998). The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. Routledge.
Richard Ned Lebow & Mark Irving Lichbach (eds.) (2007). Social Inquiry and Political Knowledge. Palgrave Macmillan.
Marcin Miłkowski (2008). Definining Ontological Naturalism. In Alexander Hieke & Hannes Leitgeb (eds.), Reduction and Elimination in Philosophy and the Sciences. Papers of the 31st International Wittgenstein Symposium. Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society.
G. P., 'All This and so Much More': Understanding Interpretation Between Originalism and Antagonism.
David Thomas (1979). Naturalism and Social Science: A Post-Empiricist Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge University Press.
Stephen Maitzen (2012). Stop Asking Why There's Anything. Erkenntnis 77 (1):51-63.
Daniel Steel & S. Kedzie Hall (2010). Naturalism and the Enlightenment Ideal : Rethinking a Central Debate in the Philosophy of Social Science. In P. D. Magnus & Jacob Busch (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Science. Palgrave Macmillan.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads104 ( #14,276 of 1,692,519 )
Recent downloads (6 months)44 ( #2,518 of 1,692,519 )
How can I increase my downloads?