David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Derrida Today 3 (2):269-294 (2010)
The long history of the overlap of science and philosophy finds a focal point in cosmology. In an effort to examine what happens when science and deconstruction encounter, this essay thus begins with, and follows the path of, cosmology. I start by suggesting a new solution to the oldest question in cosmology: why is there something rather than nothing? From this, I attempt to outline the way in which necessity is thought to operate by means of natural laws, tracing the sense in which science's demand for falsifiable claims creates an aporia in which its truths are not ultimately truthful and its necessity is not necessary. Focusing on the ways in which différance and the autoimmune can help us open up the work of science, I come to suggest two new tropes, that of apoptosis and the remainder, arguing that the inherent openness of science can be one of its strengths, especially if we ask the question of what remains to be asked once science has answered a question.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jan Such (2007). The Peculiar Status of Cosmology As a Science. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:73-80.
Henrik Zinkernagel (2002). Cosmology, Particles, and the Unity of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 33 (3):493-516.
Nicholas Maxwell (forthcoming). Popper's Paradoxical Pursuit of Natural Philosophy. In J. Shearmur & G. Stokes (eds.), Cambridge Companion to Popper. Cambridge University Press.
Ramakrishna Puligandla (2004). Consciousness, Cosmology, and Science: An Advaitic Analysis. Asian Philosophy 14 (2):147 – 153.
Elżbieta Kałuszyńska (1994). Teorie i modele. Filozofia Nauki 2.
Ronald N. Giere (1999). Science Without Laws. University of Chicago Press.
Peter Lipton (2009). Science and Religion : The Immersion Solution. In John Cornwell & Michael McGhee (eds.), Philosophers and God: At the Frontiers of Faith and Reason. Continuum. 31--46.
William C. Chittick (2007). Science of the Cosmos, Science of the Soul: The Pertinence of Islamic Cosmology in the Modern World. Oneworld.
Daniel Steel, Rethinking the Interpretivism Versus Naturalism Debate in the Philosophy of Social Science.
F. Bertola & Umberto Curi (eds.) (1988). The Anthropic Principle: Proceedings of the Second Venice Conference on Cosmology and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Nancy L. Maull (1976). Reconstructed Science as Philosophical Evidence. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:119 - 129.
Jacquelyn N. Zita (1988). Review: A Review Essay. The Feminist Question of the Science Question in Feminism: A Critical Analysis of Sandra Harding's "The Science Question in Feminism". [REVIEW] Hypatia 3 (1):157 - 168.
Martin McQuillan (2008). Derrida and Policy: Is Deconstruction Really a Social Science? Derrida Today 5 (1):119-130.
Added to index2010-11-11
Total downloads22 ( #83,083 of 1,102,030 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #128,871 of 1,102,030 )
How can I increase my downloads?