David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environmental Ethics 31 (3):227-244 (2009)
William James’s radical empiricism and pragmatism constitutes a philosophy that can reconcile the split between intrinsic value theorists, who stress the development and relevance of theoretical axiology, and pragmatists who have favored a more direct emphasis on environmental policy and application. By distinguishing James’s emphasis on direct personal experience from John Dewey’s more socialized approach, James’s distinctive emphasis on the transformative possibilities of pure experience and his links to romantic sensibility enable us to articulate and validate the noninstrumental aspects of experienced environmental values that anti-pragmatists habitually regard pragmatism as unable to speak for. Using James’s framework to explicate and support Anthony Weston’s radically noninstrumental “immediate values” better expresses the felt noninstrumental worth of nature than intrinsic value theory can. Nonetheless, a rapprochement between the two sides is possible: although James’s pragmatic naturalism is the framework that can best capture nature’s experienced noninstrumental worth and link it to wider human values, intrinsic value theory has real practical application in the realm of law, and pragmatists can support it in that domain, thus upholding the primary emphasis on practicality and policy that is usually seen as pragmatism’s main strength
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Piers H. G. Stephens (2014). Review ofPragmatic Environmentalism: Towards a Rhetoric of Eco-Justiceby Shane J. Ralston. Ethics and the Environment 19 (1):123-131.
Similar books and articles
Jason Scott Robert (2000). Wild Ontology: Elaborating Environmental Pragmatism. Ethics and the Environment 5 (2):191 - 209.
Ben A. Minteer (2001). Intrinsic Value for Pragmatists? Environmental Ethics 23 (1):57-75.
Sami Pihlström (2008). Is Jamesian Pragmatism Nominalistic? Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 32:1-7.
Wesley Cooper (1999). Pragmatism and Radical Empiricism. Inquiry 42 (3 & 4):371 – 383.
Eric Katz (1987). Searching for Intrinsic Value: Pragmatism and Despair in Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 9 (3):231-241.
Peter S. Wenz (1999). Pragmatism in Practice. Environmental Ethics 21 (4):391-410.
Douglas Anderson (2009). Old Pragmatisms, New Histories. Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (4):pp. 489-521.
Lars Samuelsson (2010). Environmental Pragmatism and Environmental Philosophy. Environmental Ethics 32 (4):405-415.
Peter S. Wenz (1999). Pragmatism in Practice: The Efficiency of Sustainable Agriculture. Environmental Ethics 21 (4):391-410.
Anthony Weston (1985). Beyond Intrinsic Value: Pragmatism in Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 7 (4):321-339.
Robert Elliot (2005). Instrumental Value in Nature as a Basis for the Intrinsic Value of Nature as a Whole. Environmental Ethics 27 (1):43-56.
Hugh P. McDonald (2002). Dewey's Naturalism. Environmental Ethics 24 (2):189-208.
William James (1907). Pragmatism. Dover Publications.
Robert E. Manning (1999). Pragmatism in Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 21 (2):191-207.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads16 ( #235,474 of 1,911,412 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #319,111 of 1,911,412 )
How can I increase my downloads?