David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):111-134 (2003)
Kant used transcendental reflection to distinguish in judgment what belongs to its form and what to its material. Regarding the form of judgment, Buchdahl's work highlights the analogies between the different levels of judgment in Kant's transcendental ontology. He uses the explicit contingency of judgments of the system of nature to illuminate the contingency of judgments of objects in general. In the Critique of pure reason, Kant had left much of the work of judgment to the unconscious imagination. Fichte and Schelling attempted to make conscious and determinate the work of the unconscious imagination, but found themselves unable to avoid a reflexive regress in trying to objectify and provide a foundation for the activity of the self in judgment. Buchdahl also clarifies the role Kant gave to the object in judgment, as the indeterminate 'thinghood' remaining once all forms of cognition are abstracted. Fichte represented this objective side of consciousness as the not-I, as the limit of the activity of the I, as an unconscious, alien element within consciousness. Schelling struggled to illuminate this unconscious object in judgment, to provide a construction of nature, without dissolving its positive presence into abstract formulations. In pursuing relentlessly Kant's critique of judgment, Fichte and Schelling exposed its opaque points and problematized the ambition to build a complete system of philosophy.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
George Di Giovanni (1979). Kant's Metaphysics of Nature and Schelling's Ideas for a Philosophy of Nature. Journal of the History of Philosophy 17 (2):197-215.
Paul Guyer (1992). The Transcendental Deduction of the Categories. In , The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge University Press. 3--123.
Immanuel Kant (1790/2005). Critique of Judgment. Barnes & Noble Books.
Wolfdietrich Schmied-Kowarzik (1997). Das Problem der Natur. Nähe und Differenz Fichtes und Schellings. Fichte-Studien 12:211-233.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Immanuel Kant (2007/2005). Critique of Judgement. Oxford University Press.
Frederick Neuhouser (1990). Fichte's Theory of Subjectivity. Cambridge University Press.
Timothy Rosenkoetter (2010). Absolute Positing, the Frege Anticipation Thesis, and Kant's Definitions of Judgment. European Journal of Philosophy 18 (4):539-566.
Benjamin Crowe (2010). Fichte's Transcendental Theology. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 92 (1):68-88.
Sally S. Sedgwick (ed.) (2000). The Reception of Kant's Critical Philosophy: Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel. Cambridge University Press.
Béatrice Longuenesse (2003). Kant's Theory of Judgment, and Judgments of Taste: On Henry Allison's "Kant's Theory of Taste&Quot;. [REVIEW] Inquiry 46 (2):143 – 163.
Immanuel Kant (2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment. Cambridge University Press.
Seung-Kee Lee (2009). The Synthetic a Priori in Kant and German Idealism. Archiv für Geschichte Der Philosophie 91 (3):288-328.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #62,896 of 1,096,264 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #81,717 of 1,096,264 )
How can I increase my downloads?