David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (1982)
This book is not aimed at exhuming Kant, but resurrecting him. It is inspired by the Critique of Pure Reason , yet is not about it: perhaps over-ambitiously, it tries to delineate not Kant's metaphysics of experience but the truth of the matter. The author shows rather than says where he agrees and disagrees with the first Critique , in so far as he understood that profound but obscure, over-systematic yet carelessly written, inspiring and infuriating, magnificent but flawed masterpiece. The book attempts a highly systematic presentation, in which the very form of the work reflects the content of the arguments. Kant is often derided for the extent to which he allows his penchant for architectonic structure to distort his insights, but it is argued that he had the right instinct in assuming that there must be some systematic way in which the necessary conditions for experience fit together. The contemporary trend in analytical philosophy seems to be towards ever more specialized, jargon-infested work, and there is a need to draw things together into a wider view that can be more generally appreciated.
|Keywords||Knowledge, Theory of Experience Perception (Philosophy Judgment Causation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$7.47 used (93% off) $84.84 new (15% off) $99.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BD161.S683 1982|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Tamar Szabó Gendler (2006). Introduction: Perceptual Experience. In John Hawthorne & Tamar Szabó Gendler (eds.), Perceptual Experience. Oxford University Press 1--30.
Paul Coates (2000). Deviant Causal Chains and Hallucinations: A Problem for the Anti-Causalist. Philosophical Quarterly 50 (200):320-331.
Tamar Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.) (2006). Perceptual Experience. Oxford University Press.
Paul Coates (1998). Perception and Metaphysical Skepticism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 72 (72):1-28.
George S. Pappas (2003). On Some Philosophical Accounts of Perception. In Journal of Philosophical Research. Charlottesville: Philosophy Documentation Center 71-82.
Johannes Roessler (2011). Causation in Commonsense Realism. In Johannes Roessler, Hemdat Lerman & Naomi Eilan (eds.), Perception, Causation, and Objectivity. Oxford University Press
Edward Craig (1976). Sensory Experience and the Foundations of Knowledge. Synthese 33 (June):1-24.
Michael J. Pendlebury (1994). Content and Causation in Perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (4):767-785.
Helen Beebee (2003). Seeing Causing. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (3):257-280.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #677,033 of 1,792,082 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,591 of 1,792,082 )
How can I increase my downloads?