The Nature and Limits of Abstraction [Book Review]

Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):166 - 174 (2004)
Abstract
This article is an extended critical study of Kit Fine’s The limits of abstraction, which is a sustained attempt to take the measure of the neo-logicist program in the philosophy and foundations of mathematics, founded on abstraction principles like Hume’s principle. The present article covers the philosophical and technical aspects of Fine’s deep and penetrating study.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,404
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Bob Hale (2000). Abstraction and Set Theory. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (4):379--398.
Bob Hale (2000). Reals by Abstractiont. Philosophia Mathematica 8 (2):100--123.

View all 8 references

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Øystein Linnebo (2004). The Limits of Abstraction. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (4):653 – 656.
StewartShapiro (2004). The Nature and Limits of Abstraction. Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):166–174.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-08-31

Total downloads

38 ( #46,148 of 1,102,993 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

9 ( #24,631 of 1,102,993 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.