Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (5):539-557 (1990)
|Abstract||The monist approach to the ancient mind-body problem styled "neurophilosophy" put forward recently by Patricia Smith Churchland on the basis of latter-day advances in the neurosciences is philosophically inadequate because it does not deal with the ethical dimension of the mind. Keywords: brain, complementarity, free will, mind-body problem, neuroscience, reductionism CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Patricia S. Churchland (1986). Neurophilosophy: Toward A Unified Science of the Mind-Brain. MIT Press.
Henrik Walter (2002). Neurophilosophy of Free Will. In Robert H. Kane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook on Free Will. Oxford University Press.
Patricia Smith Churchland (2002). Brain Wise. The MIT Press.
A. Smith (1986). Brain-Mind Philosophy. Inquiry 29 (June):203-15.
Patricia S. Churchland (1986). Replies to Comments to Symposium on Patricia Smith Churchland's Neurophilosophy. Inquiry 29 (June):241-272.
Anthony Chemero (2007). Asking What's Inside the Head: Neurophilosophy Meets the Extended Mind. Minds and Machines 17 (3).
Paul M. Churchland (2007). Neurophilosophy at Work. Cambridge University Press.
John Bickle (1997). From Sensory Neuroscience to Neurophilosophy: Reflections on Llinas and Churchland's Mind-Brain Continuum. Philosophical Psychology 10 (4):523-530.
Added to index2010-08-19
Total downloads17 ( #72,089 of 556,888 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,888 )
How can I increase my downloads?