David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 49 (1):80 – 102 (2006)
In order to understand Hegel's approach to philosophy, we need to ask why, and how, he reacts to the well-known criticism of German Romantics, like Novalis and Friedrich Schlegel, against philosophical system building in general, and against Kant's system in particular. Hegel's encyclopedic system is a topical ordering of categorically different ontological realms, corresponding to different conceptual forms of representation and knowledge. All in all it turns into a systematic defense of Fichte's doctrine concerning the primacy of us as actors with respect to any knowledge claim or scientific theory. Hegel's limitations of the principle of causality and of the possibility of using mathematical methods in science show, in fact, how a merely compatibilist solution of Kant's third antinomy can be overcome.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Lewis White Beck (1969). Kant Studies Today. La Salle, Ill.,Open Court.
Lewis White Beck (1975). The Actor and the Spectator. Yale University Press.
Nuel D. Belnap (2001). Facing the Future: Agents and Choices in Our Indeterminist World. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Jonathan Francis Bennett (1974). Kant's Dialectic. New York]Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael Rosen (1982). Hegel's Dialectic and its Criticism. Cambridge University Press.
Béatrice Longuenesse (2007). Hegel's Critique of Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press.
Cornelis Harm Glimmerveen (1992). The Force of Dialectics : On the Logical and Ontological Structures Concerning the Concepts of Force in Leibniz, Kant, and Hegel. Dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
Robert Fine (2003). Kant’s Theory of Cosmopolitanism and Hegel’s Critique. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (6):609-630.
George Di Giovanni (2003). Faith Without Religion, Religion Without Faith: Kant and Hegel on Religion. Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (3):365-383.
Peter Graham Thielke (2010). Who's Who From Kant to Hegel II: Art and the Absolute. Philosophy Compass 5 (5):398-411.
F. Beiser (2003). Hegel and Naturphilosophie. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):135-147.
Sally S. Sedgwick (ed.) (2000). The Reception of Kant's Critical Philosophy: Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads45 ( #58,714 of 1,700,417 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #128,702 of 1,700,417 )
How can I increase my downloads?