David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Religious Studies 44 (1):63-81 (2008)
A powerful argument against the resurrection of the body is based on the premise that all resurrection theories violate natural laws. We counter this argument by developing a fully naturalistic resurrection theory. We refer to it as the revision theory of resurrection (the RTR). Since Hick’s replica theory is already highly naturalistic, we use Hick’s theory as the basis for the RTR. According to Hick, resurrection is the recreation of an earthly body in another universe. The recreation is a resurrection counterpart. We show that the New Testament supports the idea of resurrection counterparts. The RTR asserts that you are a node in a branching tree of increasingly perfect resurrection counterparts. These ever better counterparts live in increasingly perfect resurrection universes. We give both theological arguments and an empirical argument for the RTR.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Kevin J. Corcoran (2001). Physical Persons and Postmortem Survival Without Temporal Gaps. In , Soul, Body, and Survival. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Michael J. Coughlan (1987). Must God Create Only the Best Possible World? Sophia 26 (2):15-19.
Frank B. Dilley (1983). Resurrection and the 'Replica Objection'. Religious Studies 19 (4):459 - 474.
Evan M. Fales (1994). Divine Freedom and the Choice of a World. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 35 (2):65 - 88.
Peter Forrest (1981). The Problem of Evil: Two Neglected Defences. [REVIEW] Sophia 20 (1):49-54.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
James A. Keller (1988). Comtemporary Christian Doubts About the Resurrection. Faith and Philosophy 5 (1):40-60.
Stephen T. Davis (2000). The Rationality of Resurrection for Christians. Philo 3 (1):41-51.
Joanna K. Forstrom (2010). John Locke and Personal Identity: Immortality and Bodily Resurrection in 17th-Century Philosophy. Continuum.
Andrei A. Buckareff & Joel S. Van Wagenen (2010). Surviving Resurrection. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 67 (3):123-139.
James F. Ross (2001). Together with the Body I Love. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:1-18.
Michael Martin (2000). Christianity and the Rationality of the Resurrection. Philo 3 (1):52-62.
Stephen T. Davis (1999). Is Belief in the Resurrection Rational? Philo 2 (1):51-61.
Robert Greg Cavin (1995). Is There Sufficient Historical Evidence to Establish the Resurrection of Jesus? Faith and Philosophy 12 (3):361-379.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #39,502 of 1,096,707 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #73,267 of 1,096,707 )
How can I increase my downloads?