Was Carnap entirely wrong, after all?
Synthese 93 (1-2):275-295 (1992)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMichael Friedman (forthcoming). Carnap on Theoretical Terms: Structuralism Without Metaphysics. Synthese.
Gregory Lavers (2008). Carnap, Formalism, and Informal Rigour. Philosophia Mathematica 16 (1):4-24.
Matthew C. Haug (2012). On the Prospects for Ontology: Deflationism, Pluralism, and Carnap's Principle of Tolerance. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (1).
William H. Berge (1995). Carnap and Translational Indeterminacy. Synthese 105 (1):115 - 121.
Stathis Psillos (2000). Carnap, the Ramsey-Sentence and Realistic Empiricism. Erkenntnis 52 (2):253-279.
Henri Galinon (2009). Les Termes Théoriques, de Carnap à Lewis. Philonsorbonne 4:1-12.
Eric J. Loomis (2006). Empirical Equivalence in the Quine-Carnap Debate. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):499–508.
Jaakko Hintikka (ed.) (1975). Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist: Materials and Perspectives. D. Reidel Pub. Co..
Benj Hellie (2013). Against Egalitarianism. Analysis 73 (2):304-320.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads47 ( #23,042 of 548,972 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,799 of 548,972 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
