David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (1996)
In this book, Edward Stein offers a clear critical account of the debate about rationality in philosophy and cognitive science. He discusses concepts of rationality--the pictures of rationality on which the debate centers--and assesses the empirical evidence used to argue that humans are irrational. He concludes that the question of human rationality must be answered not conceptually but empirically, using the full resources of an advanced cognitive science. Furthermore, he extends this conclusion to argue that empirical considerations are also relevant to the theory of knowledge--in other words, that epistemology should be naturalized
|Keywords||Charity Cognitive Science Epistemology Equilibrium Ethics Evolution Rationality Reason|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$41.99 used (58% off) $78.83 new (21% off) $84.51 direct from Amazon (15% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BD450.S747 1996|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Gerd Gigerenzer & Thomas Sturm (2012). How (Far) Can Rationality Be Naturalized? Synthese 187 (1):243-268.
Bradley Rives (2010). Concepts and Perceptual Belief: How (Not) to Defend Recognitional Concepts. [REVIEW] Acta Analytica 25 (4):369-391.
Thomas Sturm (2012). The “Rationality Wars” in Psychology: Where They Are and Where They Could Go. Inquiry 55 (1):66-81.
Lisa Bortolotti & Matthew Broome (2008). Delusional Beliefs and Reason Giving. Philosophical Psychology 21 (6):801-21.
Mikkel Gerken (2013). Epistemic Focal Bias. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (1):41 - 61.
Similar books and articles
Edward Stein (1994). Rationality and Reflective Equilibrium. Synthese 99 (2):137-72.
Fernando Broncano (2000). Reliable Rationality. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 5:49-59.
P. Carruthers (1998). Review. Without Good Reason: The Rationality Debate in Philosophy and Cognitive Science. E Stein. Rationality and Reasoning. JSBT Evans & DE Over. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):189-193.
Darren Brierton (1997). Without Good Reason: The Rationality Debate in Philosophy and Cognitive Science By Edward Stein Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1996, Pp. X + 296, £30.00 Hb. [REVIEW] Philosophy 72 (281):482-.
Renée Elio (ed.) (2002). Common Sense, Reasoning, & Rationality. Oxford University Press.
Gonzalo Munevar (1986). Consensus and Evolution in Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:120 - 129.
Tim van Gelder (2005). Enhancing and Augmenting Human Reasoning. In António Zilhão (ed.), Evolution, Rationality, and Cognition: A Cognitive Science for the Twenty-First Century. Routledge.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #50,358 of 1,096,609 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #102,815 of 1,096,609 )
How can I increase my downloads?