David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (4):617 - 639 (2011)
The notion of harmony has played a pivotal role in a number of debates in the philosophy of logic. Yet there is little agreement as to how the requirement of harmony should be spelled out in detail or even what purpose it is to serve. Most, if not all, conceptions of harmony can already be found in Michael Dummett's seminal discussion of the matter in The Logical Basis of Metaphysics. Hence, if we wish to gain a better understanding of the notion of harmony, we do well to start here. Unfortunately, however, Dummett's discussion is not always easy to follow. The following is an attempt to disentangle the main strands of Dummett's treatment of harmony. The different variants of harmony as well as their interrelations are clarified and their individual shortcomings qua interpretations of harmony are demonstrated. Though no attempt is made to give a detailed alternative account of harmony here, it is hoped that our discussion will lay the ground for an adequate rigorous treatment of this central notion
|Keywords||Harmony Logical constants|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert Brandom (2000). Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Harvard University Press.
Michael A. E. Dummett (1991). The Logical Basis of Metaphysics. Harvard University Press.
Michael A. E. Dummett (2000). Elements of Intuitionism. Oxford University Press.
Neil Tennant (1997). The Taming of the True. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Jack Woods (2012). Failures of Categoricity and Compositionality for Intuitionistic Disjunction. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 1 (4):281-291.
Owen Griffiths (2014). Harmonious Rules for Identity. Review of Symbolic Logic 7 (3):499-510.
John Cantwell (2015). An Expressivist Bilateral Meaning-is-Use Analysis of Classical Propositional Logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 24 (1):27-51.
Neil Tennant (2015). Cut for Classical Core Logic. Review of Symbolic Logic 8 (2):236-256.
Similar books and articles
Florian Steinberger (2013). On the Equivalence Conjecture for Proof-Theoretic Harmony. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 54 (1):79-86.
Peter Milne (1994). Classical Harmony: Rules of Inference and the Meaning of the Logical Constants. Synthese 100 (1):49 - 94.
Chenyang Li (2008). The Philosophy of Harmony in Classical Confucianism. Philosophy Compass 3 (3):423–435.
Stephen Read (2000). Harmony and Autonomy in Classical Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (2):123-154.
Nissim Francez & Roy Dyckhoff (2012). A Note on Harmony. Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (3):613-628.
Chenyang Li (2006). The Confucian Ideal of Harmony. Philosophy East and West 56 (4):583-603.
Fred Rush (2001). The Harmony of the Faculties. Kant-Studien 92 (1):38-61.
Chenyang Li (2008). The Ideal of Harmony in Ancient Chinese and Greek Philosophy. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7 (1):81-98.
Christopher V. Mirus (2007). Cognitive Harmony: The Role of Systemic Harmony in the Constitution of Knowledge. Review of Metaphysics 60 (4):878-882.
Florian Steinberger (2009). Not so Stable. Analysis 69 (4):655-661.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads122 ( #35,820 of 1,902,889 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #128,381 of 1,902,889 )
How can I increase my downloads?