David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 40 (2):175 – 186 (1997)
In his paper 'The Voluntariness of Judgment' Mark Thomas Walker claims that judgments are voluntary acts. According to Walker, theoretical reasoning can be seen as an instance of practical reasoning, and the outcomes of practical reasoning are actions. There are two reasons why Walker's argument does not establish this conclusion: (i) There are non-reflective judgments which cannot reasonably be described as instances of practical reasoning; Walker's argument does not apply to these judgments, (ii) If one judges that p as a result of deliberation, one has had no choice sincerely to judge as well that non-p instead of p , that is, one cannot judge contrary to one's evidence. Therefore, reflective judgments are not voluntary actions. Walker cannot show that reflective judgments are voluntary, because he fails to give a clear notion of a voluntary action and the role of choice.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Gilbert Ryle (1949). The Concept of Mind. Hutchinson and Co.
Brian O'Shaughnessy (2008). The Will: A Dual Aspect Theory. Cambridge University Press.
L. Jonathan Cohen (1992). An Essay on Belief and Acceptance. New York: Clarendon Press.
Robert N. Audi (1994). Dispositional Beliefs and Dispositions to Believe. Noûs 28 (4):419-34.
Jonathan Bennett (1990). Why Is Belief Involuntary? Analysis 50 (2):87 - 107.
Citations of this work BETA
Seumas Miller (2016). Assertions, Joint Epistemic Actions and Social Practices. Synthese 193 (1):71-94.
Seumas Miller (2015). Joint Epistemic Action and Collective Moral Responsibility. Social Epistemology 29 (3):280-302.
Similar books and articles
Hanno Sauer (2011). Social Intuitionism and the Psychology of Moral Reasoning. Philosophy Compass 6 (10):708-721.
Mark Thomas Walker (1996). The Voluntariness of Judgment. Inquiry 39 (1):97 – 119.
Mark Thomas Walker (2001). Against One Form of Judgment-Determinism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (2):199 – 227.
Mark Thomas Walker (2003). The Freedom of Judgment. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (1):63 – 92.
Mark Thomas Walker (2003). The Freedom of Judgment. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (1):63-92.
Pamela Hieronymi (2009). The Will as Reason. Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1):201-220.
Mark Thomas Walker (2001). Williams, Truth-Aimedness and the Voluntariness of Judgement. Ratio 14 (1):68–83.
Arthur F. Walker (1985). An Occurrent Theory of Practical and Theoretical Reasoning. Philosophical Studies 48 (2):199 - 210.
Mark Walker (1998). The Voluntariness of Judgment: Reply to Stein. Inquiry 41 (3):333 – 339.
Added to index2009-02-04
Total downloads9 ( #441,903 of 1,932,467 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #456,120 of 1,932,467 )
How can I increase my downloads?