Why the U.S. Must Immediately Withdraw from Iraq
International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (1):1-9 (2005)
| Abstract | In this paper, I argue that the U.S. and its coalition partners should announce that they intend to completely withdraw from Iraq within six months or less. And if this announcement did bring a suspension or reduction of hostilities against them, then, I argue, they should leave even sooner. For the most part, my grounds for holding this view are based on the lack of a justification for going to war against Iraq in the first place. But part of the grounds for an immediate withdrawal turns on what has transpired since the U.S. and its coalition partners invaded Iraq | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJ. Angelo Corlett (2010). Us Responsibility for War Crimes in Iraq. Res Publica 16 (2).
Ahmed Sahlane (2012). Argumentation and Fallacy in the Justification of the 2003 War on Iraq. Argumentation 26 (4):459-488.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-01-09Total downloads4 ( #178,748 of 549,128 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,128 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
