Art and religion
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Now, as soon as man suspects that he has another side of himself Jenseits] within himself, and that he is not enough in his mere natural state, then he is driven on to divide himself into that which he actually is, and that which he should become. Just as the youth is the future of the boy, and the mature man the future of the innocent child, so that othersider Jenseitiger] is the future man who must be expected on the other side of this present reality. Upon the awakening of that suspicion, man strives after and longs for the second other man of the future, and will not rest until he sees himself before the shape of this man from the other side. This shape fluctuates back and forth within him for a long time; he only feels it as a light in the innermost darkness of himself that would elevate itself, but as yet has no certain contour or fixed form. For a long time, along with other groping and dumb others in that darkness, the artistic genius seeks to express this presentiment. What no other succeeds in doing, he does, he presents the longing, the sought after form, and in finding its shape so creates the - Ideal. For what is then the perfect man, man's proper character, from which all that is seen is but mere appearance if it be not the Ideal Man, the Human Ideal? The artist alone has finally discovered the right word, the right picture, the right expression of that being which all seek. He presents that presentiment - it is the Ideal. 'Yes! that is it! that is the perfect shape, the appearance that we have longed for, the Good News - the Gospel. The one we sent forth so long ago with the question whose answer would satisfy the thirst of our spirit has returned!' So hail the people that creation of genius, and then fall down - in adoration.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul Nash (1965). The Educated Man. New York, Wiley.
Manfred Kraus (2010). Perelman's Interpretation of Reverse Probability Arguments as a Dialectical Mise En Abyme. Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (4):362-382.
Ömer Naci Soykan (2007). Looking at the World From Istanbul as a Metaphor. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:191-195.
Lawrence S. Stepelevich (forthcoming). Max Stirner and the Last Man. Heythrop Journal.
Agnes Heller (1981). Renaissance Man. Schocken Books.
Saxe Commins (1947). The World's Great Thinkers. New York, Random House.
Jerzy Wroblewski (1987). Nature and Man: Dilemma of the Present and the Future. Theoria 2 (2):309-322.
Anna Dziedzic (2011). Stanisław Brzozowski on the Ideal of the Modern Man. Studies in East European Thought 63 (4):345-354.
James Edward Nicholson (1943). Anthropos; or, the Problem of Man. London, Watts & Co..
Added to index2009-02-16
Total downloads11 ( #112,960 of 1,088,427 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?