Assessing Freeman's stakeholder theory
Journal of Business Ethics 87 (3):401 - 414 (2009)
| Abstract | At least since the publication of the monumental Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (1984), the “stakeholder theory” originated by R. E. Freeman has engrossed much of the business ethics literature. Subsequently, some advocates have moved a bit too quickly and without proper definition or argument. They have exceeded Freeman’s intentions which are more libertarian and free-market than is often thought. This essay focuses on the versions of stakeholder theory directly authored or coauthored by Freeman in an effort to recover (1) Freeman’s intentions and (2) the argumentative justification of stakeholder theory. It then argues that Freeman’s appeal to legal, economic, and ethical constraints ultimately produce arguments that are invalid. One can thoroughly support legislation constraining corporations or seeking to prevent age discrimination, market monopolies, and externalities and regret the extent that capitalism is heir to such shortcomings without it following that (1) business beneficiaries should be changed from stockholders to stakeholders and (2) the latter should be given serious decision-making power. Further, stakeholder theory neither defines nor battles any obvious opposition. Hence, it is difficult to see what it changes about business management. In short, stakeholder theory either changes too much about business, or nothing important at all (depending on one’s interpretation). Efforts to supplant or improve the reigning theory of capitalism will have to do better. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBradley R. Agle, Thomas Donaldson & R. Edward Freeman (2008). Dialogue: Toward Superior Stakeholder Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (2):153-190.
Laura Dunham, R. Edward Freeman & Jeanne Liedtka (2006). Enhancing Stakeholder Practice. Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (1):23-42.
Yves Fassin (2008). Imperfections and Shortcomings of the Stakeholder Model's Graphical Representation. Journal of Business Ethics 80 (4):879 - 888.
Craig P. Dunn (1996). Feminist Ethics as Moral Grounding for Stakeholder Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (2):133-147.
R. Edward Freeman (1994). The Politics of Stakeholder Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):409-421.
R. Edward Freeman (1994). The Politics of Stakeholder Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):409-421.
Bruce Langtry (1994). Stakeholders and the Moral Responsibilities of Business. Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):431-443.
Bruce Langtry (1994). Stakeholders and the Moral Responsibilities of Business. Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):431-443.
Yves Fassin (2010). A Dynamic Perspective in Freeman's Stakeholder Model. Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):39-49.
R. Edward Freeman & Robert A. Phillips (2002). Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense. Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (3):331-350.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads104 ( #5,674 of 549,088 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,333 of 549,088 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
