David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Free Inquiry 21 (2):36-38 (2001)
Normative questions – particularly questions about what we should believe and how we should behave – have always been high on the agenda for philosophers, and over the centuries there has been no shortage of answers proposed. But this abundance of answers raises yet another fundamental philosophical question: How should we evaluate the proposed answers; how can we determine whether an answer to a normative question is a good one? The best known and most widely used method for evaluating answers to normative questions can be traced all the way back to Plato. Recently, however, cognitive scientists interested in cross cultural differences have reported findings that pose a serious challenge to this venerable philosophical method. Indeed, in light of these new findings some philosophers – I am one of them – have come to think that after 2400 years it may be time for philosophy to stop relying on Plato’s method. In the pages that follow I’ll sketch the path that led me to this conclusion.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Wesley Buckwalter & Stephen Stich (2011). Competence, Reflective Equilibrium, and Dual-System Theories. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (05):251–252.
Similar books and articles
Lester F. Goodchild (1986). Toward a Foundational Normative Method in Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 5 (6):485 - 499.
Devin Henry (2012). A Sharp Eye for Kinds: Plato on Collection and Division. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 41 (January):229-55.
Michael Devitt (2009). On Determining What There Isn't. In Dominic Murphy & Michael A. Bishop (eds.), Stich and His Critics. Blackwell.
Julius Stenzel (1940/1973). Plato's Method of Dialectic. New York,Arno Press.
Howard Sankey (2002). Realism, Method and Truth. In Michele Marsonet (ed.), The Problem of Realism. Ashgate. 64.
H. H. Benson (2012). The Problem is Not Mathematics, but Mathematicians: Plato and the Mathematicians Again. Philosophia Mathematica 20 (2):170-199.
S. Marc Cohen (1973). Plato's Method of Division. In J. M. E. Moravcsik (ed.), Patterns in Plato's Thought. Reidel. 181--191.
E. Landry (2012). Recollection and the Mathematician's Method in Plato's Meno. Philosophia Mathematica 20 (2):143-169.
Harvey Siegel (1985). What is the Question Concerning the Rationality of Science? Philosophy of Science 52 (4):517-537.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #47,439 of 1,413,138 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #66,796 of 1,413,138 )
How can I increase my downloads?