David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Res Publica 16 (1):73-81 (2010)
The debate over whether ‘fair-play’ can serve as a justification for legal punishment has recently resumed with an exchange between Richard Dagger and Antony Duff. According to the fair-play theorist, criminals deserve punishment for breaking the law because in so doing the criminal upsets a fair distribution of benefits and burdens, and punishment rectifies this unfairness. Critics frequently level two charges against this idea. The first is that it often gives the wrong explanation of what makes crime deserving of punishment, since the wrongfulness of murder is not primarily about unfairness. The second is that it implies that all crimes deserve the same degree of punishment, because all crimes create the same degree of unfairness. These objections are viewed as revealing fatal flaws in the theory. Although Dagger attempts to meet these objections by drawing on political theory, Duff responds that this still draws upon the wrong kind of resources for meeting these objections. This paper argues that these two objections rest on a crucial mistake that has been overlooked by both the defenders and critics of fair-play. This mistake results from failing to distinguish between what justifies punishment as a response to crime (which requires a common element to all crime) and what justifies attaching particular penalties to crimes (which requires making distinctions in the severity of crime). The arguments presented will give reasons to consider fair-play as a viable justification for legal punishment.
|Keywords||Crime Fair-Play Law Punishment Reciprocity Retributivism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mohamad Al-Hakim (2010). Making Room for Hate Crime Legislation in Liberal Societies. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):341-358.
Shawn J. Bayern, The Significance of Private Burdens and Lost Benefits for a Fair-Play Analysis of Punishment.
Antony Duff (2008). The Incompleteness of 'Punishment as Fair Play': A Response to Dagger. Res Publica 14 (4):277-281.
Zachary Hoskins (2011). ''Fair Play, Political Obligation, and Punishment''. Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):53-71.
Michael Davis (2010). What Punishment for the Murder of 10,000? Res Publica 16 (2):101-118.
Kevin Magill (1998). The Idea of a Justification for Punishment. Critical Review Of International Social And Political Philosophy 1 (1):86-101.
Richard Stalley (2012). Adam Smith and the Theory of Punishment. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 10 (1):69-89.
Michael Otsuka (1996). Quinn on Punishment and Using Persons as Means. Law and Philosophy 15 (2):201 - 208.
Adam Kolber (2012). Unintentional Punishment. Legal Theory 18 (1):1-29.
Richard Dagger (2008). Punishment as Fair Play. Res Publica 14 (4):259-275.
Added to index2010-03-24
Total downloads31 ( #46,413 of 1,005,072 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,743 of 1,005,072 )
How can I increase my downloads?