Skepticism, relevant alternatives, and deductive closure
Philosophical Studies 29 (4):249--261 (1976)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDylan Dodd (2012). Evidentialism and Skeptical Arguments. Synthese 189 (2):337-352.
Mark Heller (1999). Relevant Alternatives and Closure. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (2):196 – 208.
E. J. Coffman (2006). Defending Klein on Closure and Skepticism. Synthese 151 (2):257 - 272.
Adam Leite (2004). Skepticism, Sensitivity, and Closure. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (3):335-350.
Jonathan Schaffer (2001). Knowledge, Relevant Alternatives and Missed Clues. Analysis 61 (3):202–208.
Stewart Cohen (1998). Two Kinds of Skeptical Argument. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (1):143 - 159.
Stewart Cohen (1998). Two Kinds of Skeptical Argument. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (1):143-159.
Palle Yourgrau (1983). Knowledge and Relevant Alternatives. Synthese 55 (2):175 - 190.
James L. White (1991). Knowledge and Deductive Closure. Synthese 86 (3):409 - 423.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads77 ( #10,373 of 549,078 )Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #4,559 of 549,078 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
