Graduate studies at Western
Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (1):149-169 (2011)
|Abstract||Engineering societies such as the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) and associated entities have defined engineering and professionalism in such a way as to require the benefit of humanity (NSPE 2009a, Engineering Education Resource Document. NSPE Position Statements. Governmental Relations). This requirement has been an unnecessary and unfortunate add-on. The trend of the profession to favor the idea of requiring the benefit of humanity for professionalism violates an engineer’s rights. It applies political pressure that dissuades from inquiry, approaches to new knowledge and technologies, and the presentation, publication, and use of designs and research findings. Moreover, a more politically neutral definition of engineering and/or professionalism devoid of required service or benefit to mankind does not violate adherence to strong ethical standards|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert E. McGinn (2003). “Mind the Gaps”: An Empirical Approach to Engineering Ethics, 1997–2001. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4):517-542.
Michael Davis (2001). The Professional Approach to Engineering Ethics: Five Research Questions. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):379-390.
Kevin D. Hall (2004). Student Development and Ownership of Ethical and Professional Standards. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2):383-387.
Michael S. Pritchard (2000). Service-Learning and Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3):413-422.
James Hamilton Schaub, Karl Pavlovic & M. D. Morris (eds.) (1983/1986). Engineering Professionalism and Ethics. Krieger Pub. Co..
Armin Grunwald (2001). The Application of Ethics to Engineering and the Engineer's Moral Responsibility: Perspectives for a Research Agenda. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):415-428.
Steven P. Nichols (1997). Professional Responsibility: The Role of the Engineer in Society. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):327-337.
C. Thomas Rogers (1980). The End-Use Problem in Engineering Ethics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:464 - 480.
Charles E. Harris (2008). The Good Engineer: Giving Virtue its Due in Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (2):153-164.
Added to index2009-10-14
Total downloads40 ( #33,736 of 733,136 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 733,136 )
How can I increase my downloads?