Hypatia 20 (2):7-26 (2005)
|Abstract||: One of the most fundamental premises of feminist philosophy is the assumption of an invidious asymmetry between the genders that has to be overcome. Parallel to this negative account of asymmetry we also find a positive account, developed in particular within the context of so-called feminist philosophies of difference. I explore both notions of gender asymmetry. The goal is a clarification of the notion of asymmetry as it can presently be found in feminist philosophy. Drawing upon phenomenology (Merleau-Ponty, Levinas) as well as feminist difference theory (Irigaray), I argue that a gender asymmetry does exist that cannot—as in the first assumption—be transformed into symmetry|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
M. H. Caviness (2010). Feminism, Gender Studies, and Medieval Studies. Diogenes 57 (1):30-45.
Silvia Stoller (2000). Reflections on Feminist Merleau-Ponty Skepticism. Hypatia 15 (1):175-182.
T. V. Barchunova (2003). The Selfish Gender, or the Reproduction of Gender Asymmetry in Gender Studies. Studies in East European Thought 55 (1):3-25.
Emily Zakin (2000). Bridging the Social and the Symbolic: Toward a Feminist Politics of Sexual Difference. Hypatia 15 (3):19-44.
Rosi Braidotti (2011). Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. Columbia University Press.
E. A. Grosz (2011). Becoming Undone: Darwinian Reflections on Life, Politics, and Art. Duke University Press.
Alison Stone (2006). Luce Irigaray and the Philosophy of Sexual Difference. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #133,343 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,320 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?