David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Possessive DPs are “complex” in the sense that they involve two distinct nominal expressions as components.1 In this paper I address the issue of characterizing the nature of the syntactic relation holding between these two nominal expressions in possessives whose possessum is arguably not a syntactic argument-taking category. This amounts to providing an account of what licenses the insertion of the possessor in the derivation of possessive DPs and in accounting for any further steps in the syntactic derivation which lead to the structure which undergoes Spell-Out.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Bertram Morris (1965). Possessive Individualism and Political Realities:The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke C. B. MacPherson. Ethics 75 (3):207-.
Ed Keenan, Extraction Without Movement: Is Malagasy a Perfect Language?† Edward L. Keenan, UCLA 2005.
T. Takeuchi, R. D. Ogilvie, A. V. Ferrelli, T. I. Murphy & K. Belicki (2001). The Dream Property Scale: An Exploratory English Version. Consciousness and Cognition 10 (3):341-355.
Janet Farrell Smith (1986). Possessive Power. Hypatia 1 (2):103 - 120.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads40 ( #103,263 of 1,907,366 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #42,629 of 1,907,366 )
How can I increase my downloads?