|Abstract||Possessive DPs are “complex” in the sense that they involve two distinct nominal expressions as components.1 In this paper I address the issue of characterizing the nature of the syntactic relation holding between these two nominal expressions in possessives whose possessum is arguably not a syntactic argument-taking category. This amounts to providing an account of what licenses the insertion of the possessor in the derivation of possessive DPs and in accounting for any further steps in the syntactic derivation which lead to the structure which undergoes Spell-Out.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Janet Farrell Smith (1986). Possessive Power. Hypatia 1 (2):103 - 120.
T. Takeuchi, R. D. Ogilvie, A. V. Ferrelli, T. I. Murphy & K. Belicki (2001). The Dream Property Scale: An Exploratory English Version. Consciousness and Cognition 10 (3):341-355.
Ed Keenan, Extraction Without Movement: Is Malagasy a Perfect Language?† Edward L. Keenan, UCLA 2005.
Bertram Morris (1965). Possessive Individualism and Political Realities:The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke C. B. MacPherson. Ethics 75 (3):207-.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #213,250 of 722,786 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?