David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Dialectica 62 (3):307-322 (2008)
I aim to draw the reader's attention to an easily overlooked account of perception, namely that there are no perceptual experiences, that to perceive something is to stand in an external, purely non-Leibnizian relation to it. I introduce the Purely Relational account of perception by discussing a case of it being overlooked in the writings of G.E. Moore, though we also find the same move in J. Cook Wilson, so it has nothing to do with an affection for sense-data. I then discuss the relation between the PR account and recent disjunctive accounts of perceptual experience, and note that the PR account has some claim to be the only one that truly respects the directness of perception. The paper does not aspire to persuade the reader of the correctness of the neglected PR account, merely that it should be treated as a serious candidate in philosophical debates about perception.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
J. Campbell (2002). Reference and Consciousness. Oxford University Press.
Hilary Putnam (1975). Mind, Language, and Reality. Cambridge University Press.
David Hume (1739/2000). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford University Press.
Charles S. Travis (2004). The Silence of the Senses. Mind 113 (449):57-94.
Fred Dretske (1969). Seeing And Knowing. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Keith Allen (2014). Hallucination And Imagination. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (2):287-302.
Similar books and articles
Stephen Everson (1996). Aristotle on Perception. Oxford University Press.
Michael Jacovides (forthcoming). Locke on Perception. In Matthew Stuart (ed.), A companion to Locke. Blackwell
Dave Ward (2009). The Agent in Magenta. Psyche 15 (1).
Lex Newman (2009). Ideas, Pictures, and the Directness of Perception in Descartes and Locke. Philosophy Compass 4 (1):134-154.
Jennifer Matey (2012). Representing the Impossible. Philosophical Psychology 26 (2):188 - 206.
Santiago Echeverri (2011). Epistemic Responsibility and Perceptual Experience. In David Lauer, Christophe Laudou, Robin Celikates & Georg W. Bertram (eds.), Expérience Et Réflexivité: Perspectives au-Delà de L’Empirisme Et de L’Idéalisme. L'harmattan
Susanna Siegel (2008). The Epistemic Conception of Hallucination. In Adrian Haddock & Fiona Macpherson (eds.), Disjunctivism: Perception, Action and Knowledge. Oxford University Press 205--224.
N. Gangopadhyay & L. Schilbach (2011). Seeing Minds: A Neurophilosophical Investigation of the Role of Perception-Action Coupling in Social Perception. Social Neuroscience.
Jody Graham (1997). Common Sense and Berkeley's Perception by Suggestion. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (3):397 – 423.
John Dilworth (2006). A Reflexive Dispositional Analysis of Mechanistic Perception. Minds and Machines 16 (4):479-493.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #151,332 of 1,938,440 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #208,303 of 1,938,440 )
How can I increase my downloads?