A reply to mr. Watkins

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 38 (1):51 – 54 (1960)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Discusses whether Watkins, following Popper, holds a "labour theory of confirmation" (of scientific hypotheses, that is, holds that there is some logical connection between there being evidence for a hypothesis and efforts having been made to test it.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to professor körner.J. W. N. Watkins - 1960 - Mind 69 (275):406-407.
Methodological individualism: A reply.J. W. N. Watkins - 1955 - Philosophy of Science 22 (1):58-62.
A Rejoinder to Professor Hempel's Reply.J. W. N. Watkins - 1958 - Philosophy 33 (127):349 - 355.
Third reply to mr Goldstein.J. W. N. Watkins - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (39):242-244.
Reply to professor Puccetti.J. W. N. Watkins - 1962 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 13 (49):53-54.
Reply to mr. stove's reply.J. W. N. Watkins - 1960 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 38 (1):54 – 58.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
28 (#514,382)

6 months
4 (#477,225)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The paradoxes of confirmation - a survey.R. Swinburne - 1971 - American Philosophical Quarterly 8 (4):318 - 330.
The context of prediction (and the paradox of confirmation).Tony Lawson - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (4):393-407.
Recent Work in Inductive Logic.Henry E. Kyburg Jr - 1964 - American Philosophical Quarterly 1 (4):249 - 287.
Reply to mr. stove's reply.J. W. N. Watkins - 1960 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 38 (1):54 – 58.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Mr. Stove's blunders.J. W. N. Watkins - 1959 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 37 (3):240 – 241.

Add more references