Bell, Bohm, and von Neumann: some philosophical inequalities concerning no-go theorems and the axiomatic method
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In T. Placek & J. Butterfield (eds.), Non-Locality and Modality. Kluwer 37--58 (2002)
The present paper investigates the philosophical relationship between John von Neumann’s Nohidden-variable theorem and Bell’s inequalities. Bell erroneously takes the axiomatic method as implying a finality claim and thus ignores von Neumann’s strongly pragmatist stance towards mathematical physics. If one considers, however, Hilbert’s axiomatic method as a critical enterprise, Bell’s theorem improves von Neumann’s by defining a more appropriate notion of ‘ hidden variable’ that permits one to include Bohm’s interpretation which recovers the predictive content of quantum mechanics. Contrary to Bell’s belief, accepting this model does not require adopting the metaphysically realist Böhm picture. If one takes the latter as a physical research programme one sees that it only partly disputes a common domain of facts with the mathematically oriented research programme of von Neumann.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Olival Freire (2006). Philosophy Enters the Optics Laboratory: Bell's Theorem and its First Experimental Tests (1965–1982). Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 37 (4):577-616.
Olival Freire (2006). Philosophy Enters the Optics Laboratory: Bell's Theorem and its First Experimental Tests. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (4):577-616.
Similar books and articles
Meir Hemmo & Orly Shenker (2006). Von Neumann's Entropy Does Not Correspond to Thermodynamic Entropy. Philosophy of Science 73 (2):153-174.
Lon Becker (2004). That Von Neumann Did Not Believe in a Physical Collapse. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (1):121-135.
Giambattista Formica (2010). Von Neumann's Methodology of Science: From Incompleteness Theorems to Later Foundational Reflections. Perspectives on Science 18 (4):480-499.
Leah Henderson (2003). The Von Neumann Entropy: A Reply to Shenker. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (2):291-296.
J. Bub & R. Clifton (1996). A Uniqueness Theorem for 'No Collapse' Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 27 (2):181-219.
Katherine Bedard (1998). Bohm, Spin, and the Bell Inequalities. Synthese 114 (3):405-444.
Abner Shimony (1984). Contextual Hidden Variables Theories and Bell's Inequalities. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (1):25-45.
Salim Rashid (1994). John von Neumann, Scientific Method and Empirical Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 1 (2):279-294.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads57 ( #83,752 of 1,940,981 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,978 of 1,940,981 )
How can I increase my downloads?