Friedrich Schlegel, romanticism, and the re-enchantment of nature

Inquiry 48 (1):3 – 25 (2005)
Abstract
In this paper I reconstruct Schlegel's idea that romantic poetry can re-enchant nature in a way that is uniquely compatible with modernity's epistemic and political values of criticism, self-criticism, and freedom. I trace several stages in Schlegel's early thinking concerning nature. First, he criticises modern culture for its analytic, reflective form of rationality which encourages a disenchanting view of nature. Second, he re-evaluates this modern form of rationality as making possible an ironic, romantic, poetry, which portrays natural phenomena as mysterious indications of an underlying reality that transcends knowledge. Yet Schlegel relies here on a contrast between human freedom and natural necessity that reinstates a disenchanting view of nature as fully intelligible and predictable. Third, therefore, he reconceives nature as inherently creative and poetic, rethinking human creativity as consisting in participation in natural creative processes. He replaces his earlier "idealist" view that reality is in itself unknowable with the "idealist realist" view that reality is knowable as creative nature, yet, in its spontaneous creativity, still eludes full comprehension. I argue that Schlegel's third approach to the re-enchantment of nature is his most consistent and satisfactory, and is important for contemporary environmental philosophy in showing how re-enchantment is compatible with modernity.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 12,095
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
H. O. Mounce (2008). Nature and Ethics. International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (2):155-164.
H. O. Mounce (2008). Nature and Ethics. International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (2):155-164.
Barry Stocker (2007). The Novel and Hegel's Philosophy of Literature. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 12:43-48.
Roy Brand (2004). Schlegel's Fragmentary Project. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (1):37-52.
Alison Stone (2008). Being, Knowledge, and Nature in Novalis. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (1):141-163.
Eliot Deutsch (1986). East-West. Environmental Ethics 8 (4):293-299.
Alison Stone (2006). Adorno and the Disenchantment of Nature. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (2):231-253.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

16 ( #108,626 of 1,102,060 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #306,621 of 1,102,060 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.