Hannah Arendt and Susan Griffin: Toward a Feminist Metahistory
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Cecile Tougas & Sara Ebenreck (eds.), Presenting Women Philosophers. Temple University Press (2000)
Efforts to introduce particular-focused and emotionally engaged storytelling into historiography have sparked intense debate. Stone-Mediatore argues that women and other under-represented groups have a particular interest in defending the epistemic value of storytelling, but that we can do so meaningfully -- not by endorsing all storytelling -- but only by articulating a metahistory that challenges the division between history and story as well as makes explicit the interrelated epistemic and ethical goals of historical inquiry. The author draws on Hannah Arendt and Susan Griffin to begin to articulate such a feminist metahistory. She argues that such a metahistory throws light on the potential value of creative and engaged storytelling, not only for understanding historical events but also for building less violent worlds.
|Keywords||feminist epistemology metahistory philosphy of historiography epistemology of testimony narrative theory Hannah Arendt Susan Griffin Roland Barthes Hayden White Kant, reflective judgment|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Shari Stone-Mediatore (2003). Reading Across Borders: Storytelling and Knowledges of Resistance. Palgrave Macmillan.
Andrea Nye (1996). Review: Friendship Across Generations. [REVIEW] Hypatia 11 (3):154 - 160.
Amy Allen (1999). Solidarity After Identity Politics: Hannah Arendt and the Power of Feminist Theory. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (1):97-118.
Joanne Cutting-Gray (1993). Hannah Arendt, Feminism, and the Politics of Alterity: "What Will We Lose If We Win?". Hypatia 8 (1):35 - 54.
Terry Winant (1987). The Feminist Standpoint: A Matter of Language. Hypatia 2 (1):123 - 148.
Irving Louis Horowitz (2012). Hannah Arendt: Radical Conservative. Transaction Publishers.
Linda M. G. Zerilli (2005). "We Feel Our Freedom": Imagination and Judgment in the Thought of Hannah Arendt. Political Theory 33 (2):158 - 188.
Seyla Benhabib (ed.) (2010). Politics in Dark Times: Encounters with Hannah Arendt. Cambridge University Press.
Margaret Betz Hull (2002). The Hidden Philosophy of Hannah Arendt. Routledgecurzon.
Maren Klawiter (1990). Using Arendt and Heidegger to Consider Feminist Thinking on Women and Reproductive / Infertility Technologies. Hypatia 5 (3):65 - 89.
Shari Stone-Mediatore (2010). Epistemologies of Discomfort: What Military-Family Anti-War Activists Can Teach Us About Knowledge of Violence. Studies in Social Justice 4 (1):25-45.
Ronald Beiner (1997). Rereading Hannah Arendt's Kant Lectures. Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (1):21-32.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-05-09
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?