Moderate monism: Reply to Noonan and Mackie
Analysis 69 (1):91-95 (2009)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesB. J. Garrett (1987). A Further Reply to Noonan. Analysis 47 (4):204 - 207.
E. J. Lowe (1987). Reply to Noonan. Analysis 47 (4):201 - 203.
Richard Swinburne (1983). Mackie, Induction, and God. Religious Studies 19 (3):385 - 392.
Robert H. Ennis (1982). Mackie's Singular Causality and Linked Overdetermination. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:55 - 64.
David Mackie (1999). Animalism Versus Lockeanism: No Contest. Philosophical Quarterly 50 (196):369-376.
Daniel D. Hutto (1998). Davidson's Identity Crisis. Dialectica 52 (1):45-61.
Ted Honderich (1983). Anomalous Monism: Reply to Smith. Analysis 43 (June):147-149.
Harold W. Noonan (2001). Animalism Versus Lockeanism: Reply to Mackie. Philosophical Quarterly 51 (202):83-90.
Harold W. Noonan (2008). Moderate Monism and Modality. Analysis 68 (297):88–94.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-02-23Total downloads46 ( #23,815 of 549,066 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
