David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 10 (1):251-282 (2010)
Socrates and Meno reach two different conclusions: in the first part of the dialogue, that virtue is knowledge and can therefore be taught; in the second, that it is reliable true opinion and can therefore be acquired only by divine inspiration. Taking into account Socrates’ role as a teacher (of his interlocutors and of Plato) and Plato’s role as a teacher (of us), I show that neither of these conclusions is consistent with the existence of philosophy as a human institution, and argue that, for this reason, Plato refuses ultimately to endorse either of them.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Plato & G. M. A. Grube (1976). Meno. Hackett Publishing.
Plato & G. M. A. Grube (1949). Meno. New York, Liberal Arts Press.
Roslyn Weiss (2001). Virtue in the Cave: Moral Inquiry in Plato's Meno. Oxford University Press.
Peter Warnek (2003). Teiresias in Athens. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 7 (2):261-289.
Plato (2006). Plato's Meno. Cambridge Univ Pr.
Plato (2006). Plato's Meno. Cambridge University Press.
Rachana Kamtekar (2008). Plato on Education and Art. In Gail Fine (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Plato. Oxford University Press 336--359.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads83 ( #56,843 of 1,941,073 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #94,640 of 1,941,073 )
How can I increase my downloads?