Professor Chisholm on supererogation and offence
Philosophical Studies 18 (6):87 - 94 (1967)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGregory Mellema (1996). Is It Bad to Omit an Act of Supererogation? Journal of Philosophical Research 21:405-416.
Michael Corrado (1978). Professor Chisholm and the Criterion. Journal of Critical Analysis 7 (2):55-57.
Ralph Kennedy (1993). Professor Chisholm and the Problem of the Speckled Hen. Journal of Philosophical Research 18:143-147.
David Heyd (1982). Supererogation: Its Status in Ethical Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Charles A. Baylis (1959). Professor Chisholm on Perceiving. Journal of Philosophy 56 (September):773-790.
Roderick M. Chisholm & Ernest Sosa (1966). Intrinsic Preferability and the Problem of Supererogation. Synthese 16 (3-4):321 - 331.
Jonathan Dancy (1993). Beyond the Call of Duty: Supererogation, Obligation and Offence. Philosophical Books 34 (1):48-49.
Gregory Mellema (2005). Moral Dilemmas and Offence. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (3):291 - 298.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads14 ( #83,218 of 549,682 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,807 of 549,682 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
