"Honors, Awards, and the Catholic Moral Tradition"
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Catholic Legal Studies 49 (2):277-292 (2010)
|Abstract||The paper considers the moral constraints on speaking invitations and honors at Catholic colleges and universities. I argue that the Catholic moral framework does not support the current trend at many Catholic institutions toward restricting speakers to those who accept a narrow range of moral views. I employ standard Catholic philosophical principles, including double effect and cooperation, to defend the claim that Catholic institutions can at least sometimes legitimately bestow honors on pro-choice politicians.|
|Keywords||Cathaolic honors principle of double effect principle of cooperation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Joseph Boyle (1991). Who is Entitled to Double Effect? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.
Joseph Mangan (1949). An Historical Analysis of the Principle of Double Effect. Theological Studies 10:41-61.
Lawrence Masek (2011). The Contralife Argument and the Principle of Double Effect. National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 11 (1):83-97.
S. S. Coleman (2013). Direct and Indirect Abortion in the Roman Catholic Tradition: A Review of the Phoenix Case. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 25 (2):127-143.
T. A. Cavanaugh (2006). Double-Effect Reasoning: Doing Good and Avoiding Evil. Oxford University Press.
Alan Donagan (1991). Moral Absolutism and the Double-Effect Exception: Reflections on Joseph Boyle's Who is Entitled to Double-Effect? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):495-509.
Marc Hauser, Fiery Cushman, Liane Young, J. I. N. Kang-Xing & John Mikhail (2007). A Dissociation Between Moral Judgments and Justifications. Mind and Language 22 (1):1–21.
Elizabeth A. Linehan (2005). Crime and Catholic Tradition. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:61-72.
John Zeis (2004). Killing Innocents and the Doctrine of Double Effect. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:133-144.
Neil Delaney (2001). To Double Business Bound. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 75 (4):561-583.
H. M. Giebel (2007). Ends, Means, and Character: Recent Critiques of the Intended-Versus-Forseen Distinction and the Principle of Double Effect. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (3):447-468.
Todd A. Salzman (ed.) (1999). Method and Catholic Moral Theology: The Ongoing Reconstruction. Creighton University Press.
Janette M. Blandford (2002). Employment-at-Will in the Context of Catholic Higher Education. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:275-286.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-08-14
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?