Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):51-51 (2000)
|Abstract||Neuroimaging evidence suggests that the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) supports temporary storage of linguistic material during linguistic tasks rather than computing a syntactic representation. The LIFG is not activated by simple sentences but by complex sentences and maintenance of word lists. Under this hypothesis, agrammatism should only disturb comprehension for constructions in which storage is essential.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alain Morin & J. Michaud, Self-Awareness and the Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus: Selective Involvement of Inner Speech in Self-Related Processes.
Gregory Hickok (2000). The Left Frontal Convolution Plays No Special Role in Syntactic Comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):35-36.
Claudio Luzzatti & Maria Teresa Guasti (2000). Agrammatism, Syntactic Theory, and the Lexicon: Broca's Area and the Development of Linguistic Ability in the Human Brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):41-42.
Angela D. Friederici & D. Yves von Cramon (2000). Syntax in the Brain: Linguistic Versus Neuroanatomical Specificity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):32-33.
Thomas G. Bever & David J. Townsend (2001). Some Sentences on Our Consciousness of Sentences. In Emmanuel Dupoux (ed.), Language, Brain, and Cognitive Development: Essays in Honor of Jacques Mehler. MIT Press.
Amanda Parker (1999). Memory Systems, Frontal Cortex, and the Hippocampal Axis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):464-465.
René David & Karim Nour (1995). Storage Operators and Directed Lambda-Calculus. Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (4):1054-1086.
Nelson Cowan (2006). Within Fluid Cognition: Fluid Processing and Fluid Storage? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):129-130.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?