David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (1):97–128 (2001)
To what extent, if any, is the moral thought of Thomas Aquinas 'Aristotelian'? This question is not simply of historical interest, since it directs our attention to those areas of contemporary English-speaking moral philosophy where Thomas is discussed. In some quarters there is a tendency to classify Thomas as a thinker in the 'Aristotelian tradition', and his debt to Aristotle is thought to be apparent in his remarks on moral reasoning and virtue. Nowhere is this tendency more evident than in discussions of Thomas by supporters of modern virtue ethics. In this paper, I will argue that the relationship of Thomas's ethics to Aristotle is much more complicated than these discussions assume. Despite the strong and interesting affinities that exist between the practical philosophies of Thomas and Aristotle, the sum total of their common features can never disguise nor dilute the profound differences that separate them. The paper will conclude with some suggestions as to how an appreciation of these differences can enable us to cast Thomas's remarks on virtue in a different light
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Anthony Kenny (1969). Aquinas. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
Tobias Hoffmann (2008). Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas on Magnanimity. In István Pieter Bejczy (ed.), Virtue Ethics in the Middle Ages: Commentaries on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, 1200 -1500. Brill
Tobias Hoffmann (2006). Voluntariness, Choice, and Will in the Ethics Commentaries of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas. Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 17:71-92.
Harm Goris (2003). The Angelic Doctor and Angelic Speech: The Development of Thomas Aquinas's Thought on How Angels Communicate. Medieval Philosophy and Theology 11 (1):87-105.
Christopher Kaczor (2004). Thomas Aquinas's Commentary on the Ethics. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (3):353-378.
Yong Huang (2011). Two Dilemmas in Virtue Ethics and How Zhu Xi's Neo-Confucianism Avoids Them. Journal of Philosophical Research 36:247-281.
Eleonore Stump (2011). The Non-Aristotelian Character of Aquinas's Ethics. Faith and Philosophy 28 (1):29-43.
Fergus Kerr (2009). Thomas Aquinas: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Anthony Kenny (1980). Aquinas. Hill and Wang.
John M. Connolly (2009). Eudaimonism, Teleology, and the Pursuit of Happiness. Faith and Philosophy 26 (3):274-296.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #152,492 of 1,934,424 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #269,405 of 1,934,424 )
How can I increase my downloads?