David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:263-273 (2010)
In this paper I investigate how works of fine art differ from products of craft. I argue that historical and institutional definitions are incomplete becausethey fail to explain what is common to everything we call art. I then consider the way in which Francis J. Kovach and Jacques Maritain define art. I argue thatKovach’s four-fold division fails on logical grounds. Maritain’s division, however, makes the distinction between fine and useful art a matter of degree, not a division into separate species. This does reflect our use of the word art, and means that, when we call something a work of fine art, we are not designating it as part of a species. Rather we signify that it possesses a particular attribute which, in some way, belongs to every product of human making, but is more clearly present, or more attended to, in works of fine art
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ronald L. Hall (1982). Michael Polanyi on Art and Religion: Some Critical Reflections on Meaning. Zygon 17 (1):9-18.
David Clowney (2011). Definitions of Art and Fine Art's Historical Origins. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 69 (3):309-320.
Laurie Adams (2006). The Making and Meaning of Art. Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Dominic McIver Lopes (2007). Conceptual Art is Not What It Seems. In Peter Goldie & Elisabeth Schellekens (eds.), Philosophy and Conceptual Art. Oxford University Press
Christy Mag Uidhir (2010). Failed-Art and Failed Art-Theory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (3):381-400.
C. E. Emmer (1998). Kitsch Against Modernity. Art Criticism 13 (1):53-80.
Nick Riggle (2010). Street Art: The Transfiguration of the Commonplaces. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (3):243-257.
Nicholas Stang (2012). Artworks Are Not Valuable for Their Own Sake. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (3):271-280.
Milton C. Nahm (1947). The Functions of Art and Fine Art in Communication. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 5 (4):273-280.
Cristian Hainic (2011). A Few Uses of Phenomenology Within Art History. Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (1):70-78.
Nick Zangwill (1999). Art and Audience. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57 (3):315-332.
Lars Aagaard-Mogensen (ed.) (1976). Culture and Art: An Anthology. Humanities Press.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads10 ( #228,010 of 1,725,575 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #167,283 of 1,725,575 )
How can I increase my downloads?