David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 12:43-48 (2007)
Hegel's philosophy of literature, in the Aesthetics and other texts, gives no extended discussion of the novel. Hegel's predecessor Friedrich Schlegel had produced a philosophy of literature with a central position for the novel. Schlegel's discussion of the novel is based on a view of Irony which allows the novel to be the fusion of poetry and philosophy. Hegel retained a place for art, including poetry, below that of philosophy. The Ironic conception of the novel has themes, which also appear in Hegel, of the unity of opposites. However, for Hegel Irony does not allow the unity of artistic form and does not allow art to be guided by law and science. Therefore Hegel's philosophy of literature owes much to Schlegel but needs to attack Irony and minimise the role of the novel. Irony is criticised as a purely negative position of a 'beautiful soul', which cannot act and in its absolutely subjective resistance to evil in the world becomes evil itself. Hegel gives great importance to Epic which foreshadows the emergence of philosophy in its unity, but it is a unity based on conflicting individuality and lawlessness. In the modern world Heroic lawlessness can only be approached as nostalgia, the novel cannot integrate individuality and law, only religion and philosophy above aesthetics, including the novel
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ayon Roy (2009). Hegel Contra Schlegel; Kierkegaard Contra De Man. PMLA 124 (1):107-126.
Victoria I. Burke (2010). Hegel, Antigone, and First-Person Authority. Philosophy and Literature 34 (2):373-380.
Alfred Dunshirn (2004). Die Einheit der Ilias Als Tragisches Selbstbewusstsein. Das Homerische Epos Bei G.W.F. Hegel in der Phänomenologie des Geistes Und in den Vorlesungen Über Die Ästhetik. [REVIEW] Dissertation, Universität Wien
Andrew Buchwalter (2011). Dialectics, Politics, and the Contemporary Value of Hegel's Practical Philosophy. Routledge.
Allen Speight (2001). Hegel, Literature, and the Problem of Agency. Cambridge University Press.
Frederick C. Beiser (ed.) (1993). The Cambridge Companion to Hegel. Cambridge University Press.
Alasdair C. MacIntyre (1972). Hegel. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
Alasdair C. MacIntyre (1976). Hegel: A Collection of Critical Essays. University of Notre Dame Press.
Benjamin Rutter (2010). Hegel on the Modern Arts. Cambridge University Press.
Sebastian Rand (2007). The Importance and Relevance of Hegel's Philosophy of Nature. Review of Metaphysics 61 (2):379-400.
Howard P. Kainz (1974). Hegel's Philosophy of Right, with Marx's Commentary: A Handbook for Students. Martinus Nijhoff.
Florian Demont (2008). The Expression of Self-Consciousness in Kamala Das's ''An Introduction''. Consciousness, Literature, and the Art 9 (2).
Dale M. Schlitt (1990). Divine Subjectivity: Understanding Hegel's Philosophy of Religion. University of Scranton Press.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads35 ( #123,928 of 1,938,465 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #98,698 of 1,938,465 )
How can I increase my downloads?