Animal biotechnology and the non-identity problem
American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):47 – 48 (2008)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMickey Gjerris (2008). The Three Teachings of Biotechnology. In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
David Degrazia (2005). Enhancement Technologies and Human Identity. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (3):261 – 283.
Stephan Blatti (2007). Animalism and Personal Identity. In M. Bekoff (ed.), Encyclopedia of Human-Animal Relationships. Greenwood Press.
Autumn Fiester (2008). Justifying a Presumption of Restraint in Animal Biotechnology Research. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):36 – 44.
Clare Palmer (2011). Animal Disenhancement and the Non-Identity Problem: A Response to Thompson. Nanoethics 5 (1):43-48.
David J. Mellor (2009). The Sciences of Animal Welfare. Wiley-Blackwell.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads5 ( #160,368 of 549,084 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,084 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
